Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: the OCUU-CRPC study

Background Before the androgen target therapy era, flutamide was widely used for castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan. Enzalutamide is currently the recommended treatment; however, the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide and flutamide after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical oncology 2020-03, Vol.25 (3), p.486-494
Hauptverfasser: Iguchi, Taro, Tamada, Satoshi, Kato, Minoru, Yasuda, Sayaka, Machida, Yuichi, Ohmachi, Tetsuji, Ishii, Keiichi, Iwata, Hiroyuki, Yamamoto, Shinji, Kanamaru, Tomohiro, Morimoto, Kazuya, Hase, Taro, Tashiro, Koichiro, Harimoto, Koji, Deguchi, Takashi, Adachi, Takahisa, Iwamoto, Katsuki, Takegaki, Yoshinori, Nakatani, Tatsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Before the androgen target therapy era, flutamide was widely used for castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan. Enzalutamide is currently the recommended treatment; however, the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide and flutamide after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide, has not been compared. Methods Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide were randomly assigned to receive either enzalutamide or flutamide. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the 3-month prostate-specific antigen response rate. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02346578) and the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000016301). Results Overall, 103 patients were enrolled. The 3- (80.8% vs. 35.3%; p  
ISSN:1341-9625
1437-7772
DOI:10.1007/s10147-019-01554-3