Prognostic value of ADC measurements in predicting overall survival in patients undergoing 90 Y radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases
To assess the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the overall survival in patients who underwent Yttrium 90 radioembolization ( Y-RE) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with other well-established clinical and imaging parameters by comparing the pre- and post-treatment appar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 2019-09, Vol.57, p.124 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To assess the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the overall survival in patients who underwent Yttrium 90 radioembolization (
Y-RE) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with other well-established clinical and imaging parameters by comparing the pre- and post-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the lesions.
A total of 81 metastatic lesions of 27 consecutive patients who underwent DWI before and after the
Y-RE session were enrolled in the study. ADC values were calculated from the entire (ADC
) and peripheral (ADC
) tumor on pre- and post-treatment DWI, and any relative increase in ADC >0% accepted as a functional imaging response. The impact of functional imaging response in addition to other well-known parameters including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), hepatic tumor burden, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) and the presence of extrahepatic metastases in predicting overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression analyses.
The median OS of the patients was 10 months (range, 6-20 months) while the median OS of the responders being significantly longer than the non-responders for ADC
and ADC
(median 11 vs 7 months, P = 0.003; median 12 vs. 7 months, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.015 |