Comparison of two models of intrauterine growth restriction for early catch-up growth and later development of glucose intolerance and obesity in rats

Nutrition and Health Department, Nestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland Submitted February 27, 2009 ; accepted in final form October 28, 2009 Two models of intrauterine growth restriction, maternal food restriction (FR), and dexamethasone (DEX) exposure were compared for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2010-01, Vol.298 (1), p.R141-R146
Hauptverfasser: Shahkhalili, Yasaman, Moulin, Julie, Zbinden, Irene, Aprikian, Olivier, Mace, Katherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nutrition and Health Department, Nestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland Submitted February 27, 2009 ; accepted in final form October 28, 2009 Two models of intrauterine growth restriction, maternal food restriction (FR), and dexamethasone (DEX) exposure were compared for early postnatal catch-up growth and later development of glucose intolerance and obesity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Mated dams were randomly divided into three groups at 10 days gestational age. Group FR was food restricted (50% of nongestating rats) during the last 11 days of gestation; Group DEX received DEX injections during the last week of gestation, and Group CON, the control group, had no intervention. Birth weight, catch-up growth, body weight, and food intake were measured in male offspring for 22 wk. Body composition, blood glucose, and plasma insulin in response to a glucose load were assessed at 8, 16, and 22 wk. Pups from both FR and DEX dams had similarly lower birth weights than CON (22% and 25%, P < 0.0001), but catch-up growth, which occurred during the suckling period, was much more rapid in FR than DEX offspring (6 vs. 25 days, 95% CI). Postweaning, there were no significant differences between groups in food intake, body weight, body fat, and plasma insulin, but baseline plasma glucose at 22 wk and 2-h glucose area-under-the-curve at 8 and 22 wk were greater only in FR vs. CON offspring ( P < 0.05), thereby contrasting with the lack of significant differences between DEX and CON. These results suggest that prenatal food restriction is a more sensitive model than DEX exposure for studies aimed at investigating the link between low birth weight, early postnatal catch-up growth, and later development of glucose intolerance. prenatal food restriction; prenatal dexamethasone exposure Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Shahkhalili, Nestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, P.O. Box 44, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland (e-mail: yasaman.shahkhalili{at}rdls.nestle.com ).
ISSN:0363-6119
1522-1490
DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.00128.2009