Comments on Christopher Ehret, "Bantu History: Re-Envisioning the Evidence of Language"

Christopher Ehret's "Bantu History: Re-envisioning the Evidence of Language" is critiqued. One of the great merits of Ehret's article is that it describes the methodology of lexicostatistics with sufficient clarity and succinctness to be readily intelligible to non-linguists.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of African historical studies 2001-01, Vol.34 (1), p.43-81
Hauptverfasser: Oliver, Roland, Spear, Thomas, Klieman, Kairn, Vansina, Jan, MacEachern, Scott, Schoenbrun, David, Denbow, James, Bastin, Yvonne, Batibo, H. M., Heine, Bernd, Mann, Michael, Nurse, Derek, Wandibba, Simiyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Christopher Ehret's "Bantu History: Re-envisioning the Evidence of Language" is critiqued. One of the great merits of Ehret's article is that it describes the methodology of lexicostatistics with sufficient clarity and succinctness to be readily intelligible to non-linguists.
ISSN:0361-7882
2326-3016
DOI:10.2307/3097286