ORIGINAL ARTICLES: SOCIAL RESEARCH, PLANNING AND PRACTICE: Survey of implementation of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines in nine Asian countries
After the release of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines in 2001 and update in 2003, its implementation in nine Asian countries was investigated. Questionnaire surveys involving thoraco-pulmonary physicians or internists investigated the awareness and consens...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geriatrics & gerontology international 2007-06, Vol.7 (2), p.174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | After the release of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines in 2001 and update in 2003, its implementation in nine Asian countries was investigated. Questionnaire surveys involving thoraco-pulmonary physicians or internists investigated the awareness and consensus of the GOLD guidelines including the care and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in Asian. Two surveys were conducted, in June 2002 and March 2004, through questionnaires by direct mail in Japan and face-to-face interviews in the other countries. Approximately 600 questionnaires were returned with approximately 84% awareness of the publication and its update and nearly 90% appreciated the globalization efforts. The survey revealed great variances concerning the definition of COPD, its diagnosis, and use of computed tomography. As for the implementation, the majority answered the use of the combined local and GOLD guidelines in five of nine countries surveyed, while the GOLD guidelines were implemented mainly in Korea, suggesting the influence in daily practice for care and management of COPD patients. Implication of rehabilitation in clinical practice has not been standardized despite high evidence of its advantages. Most respondents stated the necessity of developing a local or regional guideline for best practice. Our survey revealed: (i) awareness of the GOLD guidelines was high and well accepted; (ii) the possibility of developing a uniform or standard guideline in Asia is low due to local characteristics; (iii) modifications of the GOLD guidelines may be more practical; and (iv) that the multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation program needs to be further activated in GOLD implementation for the Asia-Pacific region. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1444-1586 1447-0594 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2007.00383.x |