Socio-psychological salience and categorisation accuracy of speaker place of origin

•Examined 191 Thai students’ categorisations of geographical origin of speakers of English.•Distinction between native-non-native English the primary perceptual dimension.•Socio-psychological salience of speech form the key determinant of categorisation accuracy.•Tendency for Thai students to confla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lingua 2019-09, Vol.228, p.102705, Article 102705
Hauptverfasser: McKenzie, Robert M., Huang, Mimi, Ong, Theng Theng, Snodin, Navaporn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Examined 191 Thai students’ categorisations of geographical origin of speakers of English.•Distinction between native-non-native English the primary perceptual dimension.•Socio-psychological salience of speech form the key determinant of categorisation accuracy.•Tendency for Thai students to conflate Asian English speech forms and segmental features largely responsible for (mis)categorisations.•Speaker categorisation leads to social evaluation of perceived group membership. There exists a dearth of research investigating how listeners use their knowledge of variation in their L2 to categorise speaker provenance from stimulus speech. The present study, employing a free classification measure, examined 191 Thai university students' categorisations of the geographical origin of nine speakers of English. Analysis demonstrated participants were generally able to distinguish between native and non-native English speech more broadly, and this distinction was found to be the primary perceptual dimension underlying speaker provenance categorisations. With regards to more fine-grained classifications, recognition rates for Thai, UK, US and Indian English speakers were substantially higher when compared to Vietnamese and Australian English speakers, indicating the social-psychological salience of the speech forms, rather than geographical proximity, was key in determining categorisation accuracy. Analysis of misidentification patterns showed a tendency for the Thai students to conflate Asian English speech forms, despite substantial phonological and phonetic differences between the English spoken in different Asian nations. Participant comments also indicated segmental features were largely responsible for (mis)categorisations. Consistent with current speaker evaluation theories, the findings point to speaker categorisation as an initial processing stage, leading to the activation of stereotypes about and attitudes towards the speakers' perceived social and ethnic group membership.
ISSN:0024-3841
1872-6135
DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.006