Nonsmooth Kantorovich–Newton Methods: Hypotheses and Auxiliary Problems
In Newton’s method 0 ∈ f ( x k ) + G ( x k )( x k + 1 − x k ) for solving a nonsmooth equation f ( x ) = 0, the type of approximation of f by some (generally multivalued) mapping G determines not only the convergence behavior of the method, but also the difficulty and the concrete form of the auxili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vietnam journal of mathematics 2019-09, Vol.47 (3), p.639-657 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In Newton’s method 0 ∈
f
(
x
k
) +
G
(
x
k
)(
x
k
+ 1
−
x
k
) for solving a nonsmooth equation
f
(
x
) = 0, the type of approximation of
f
by some (generally multivalued) mapping
G
determines not only the convergence behavior of the method, but also the difficulty and the concrete form of the auxiliary problems. With
G
(
x
) =
∂
f
(
x
) (Clarke’s Jacobian)—like for locally convergent semismooth Newton methods—and for various other generalized “derivatives”, the inclusion is a
canonical
one, i.e., it describes the usual Newton step if
f
is continuously differentiable near
x
k
. In our paper, we are interested in Kantorovich-type statements of convergence and study which meaningful hypotheses and auxiliary problems for particular pairs (
f
,
G
) may replace those of the classical smooth case. In particular, we point out—theoretically and by an example—why the related hypotheses cannot be checked for canonical methods even if
f
is piecewise linear. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2305-221X 2305-2228 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10013-019-00348-4 |