Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury
Purpose To analyze the current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dynamic fixations (DFs) and static fixations (SFs) in treating distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries (DTSIs). Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE were systematically searched according...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020, Vol.28 (1), p.270-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To analyze the current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dynamic fixations (DFs) and static fixations (SFs) in treating distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries (DTSIs).
Methods
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify RCTs comparing the DFs and SFs for DTSIs. Included studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Postoperative functional scores, range of motion (ROM), complication rate, and incidence of reoperation were statistically analyzed using review manager software, and a
p
value of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0942-2056 1433-7347 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00167-019-05659-0 |