Allison v. Johnson: Ohio interprets its Equine Activity Liability Act

Just as recreational land use statutes were passed to encourage landowners to continue allowing recreation to occur on their property while limiting potential landowner liability, states have begun passing Equine Activity Liability Acts (EALA) in order to bolster the equine industry while limiting t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of trial advocacy 2001-10, Vol.25 (2), p.435
1. Verfasser: Tina Coker Jordan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Just as recreational land use statutes were passed to encourage landowners to continue allowing recreation to occur on their property while limiting potential landowner liability, states have begun passing Equine Activity Liability Acts (EALA) in order to bolster the equine industry while limiting the potential liability of those involved with equines from personal injury suits. Ohio examined the use of its recently enacted Equine Activity Liability act in the case of "Allison v. Johnson."
ISSN:0160-0281