Allison v. Johnson: Ohio interprets its Equine Activity Liability Act
Just as recreational land use statutes were passed to encourage landowners to continue allowing recreation to occur on their property while limiting potential landowner liability, states have begun passing Equine Activity Liability Acts (EALA) in order to bolster the equine industry while limiting t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of trial advocacy 2001-10, Vol.25 (2), p.435 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Just as recreational land use statutes were passed to encourage landowners to continue allowing recreation to occur on their property while limiting potential landowner liability, states have begun passing Equine Activity Liability Acts (EALA) in order to bolster the equine industry while limiting the potential liability of those involved with equines from personal injury suits. Ohio examined the use of its recently enacted Equine Activity Liability act in the case of "Allison v. Johnson." |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-0281 |