Clinical management of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum across primary and secondary care: a population‐based study

Objectives To assess how nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) are managed and treated across primary and secondary care. Design Population‐based pregnancy cohort. Setting Medical records (CPRD‐GOLD) from England. Population 417 028 pregnancies during 1998–2014. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2019-09, Vol.126 (10), p.1201-1211
Hauptverfasser: Fiaschi, L, Nelson‐Piercy, C, Deb, S, King, R, Tata, LJ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To assess how nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) are managed and treated across primary and secondary care. Design Population‐based pregnancy cohort. Setting Medical records (CPRD‐GOLD) from England. Population 417 028 pregnancies during 1998–2014. Methods Proportions of pregnancies with recorded NVP/HG diagnoses, primary care treatment, and hospital admissions were calculated. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to estimate adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) with 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between NVP/HG management paths and maternal characteristics. Main outcome measures NVP/HG diagnoses, treatments, and hospital admissions. Results Overall prevalence of clinically recorded NVP/HG was 9.1%: 2.1% had hospital admissions, 3.4% were treated with antiemetics in primary care only, and 3.6% had only recorded diagnoses. Hospital admissions and antiemetic prescribing increased continuously during 1998–2013 (trend P 
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.15662