Region-based image segmentation evaluation via perceptual pooling strategies

Image segmentation is an essential step for many computer vision tasks. Evaluating the quality of image segmentations becomes indispensable for choosing an appropriate output of the image segmentation algorithms. To quantitatively evaluate the segmentation quality, various evaluation measures have b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Machine vision and applications 2018-04, Vol.29 (3), p.477-488
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Bo, Simfukwe, Macmillan, Li, Tianrui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Image segmentation is an essential step for many computer vision tasks. Evaluating the quality of image segmentations becomes indispensable for choosing an appropriate output of the image segmentation algorithms. To quantitatively evaluate the segmentation quality, various evaluation measures have been proposed to produce a quality map, and a spatial pooling algorithm is followed to combine the quality map into a single quality score. In this paper, we propose two pooling strategies instead of using the conventional spatial average operation. By assigning perceptual meaningful weights to the quality maps, we obtain evaluation measures that are correlated with the human perception of segmentation quality. Specifically, a quality-based and a visual importance-based pooling strategies are designed and tested on some popular evaluation measures, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that applies perceptual pooling strategies for segmentation evaluation. Extensive experiments are conducted on a subjective evaluation benchmark and the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset (BSDS500). The results indicate that the proposed strategies can improve the performance of existing evaluation measures and produce a more perceptually meaningful judgment on the segmentation quality.
ISSN:0932-8092
1432-1769
DOI:10.1007/s00138-017-0903-x