Genetic transformation of grape varieties and rootstocks via organogenesis
A protocol was standardized to regenerate six grape cultivars through meristematic bulk (MB) induction, which was used for genetic transformation. Meristematic bulk induction worked best with Vitis vinifera ‘Thompson Seedless’ (98.4 %), followed by ‘Chardonnay’ (97.6 %), ‘Redglobe’ (90.2 %) and ‘Cab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant cell, tissue and organ culture tissue and organ culture, 2016-09, Vol.126 (3), p.541-552 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A protocol was standardized to regenerate six grape cultivars through meristematic bulk (MB) induction, which was used for genetic transformation. Meristematic bulk induction worked best with
Vitis vinifera
‘Thompson Seedless’ (98.4 %), followed by ‘Chardonnay’ (97.6 %), ‘Redglobe’ (90.2 %) and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (86.2 %), and was less successful with
Vitis rupestris
‘St. George’ (85.4 %) and ‘101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (
Vitis riparia
×
V. rupestris
)’ (79.6 %). Benzylaminopurine and naphthaleneacetic acid was the most effective combination of cytokinin and auxin for MB formation. 100 µg/ml kanamycin was a better antibiotic selection agent than 2.0 µg/ml hygromycin during transformation. The expression of green fluorescent protein was evaluated with in vitro leaves and roots. Transformation efficiency using meristematic slices was a function of the genotype. Transformation efficiency was greatest in Chardonnay (51.7 %), followed by Thompson Seedless (42.3 %), St. George (41.6 %), Redglobe (40 %), Cabernet Sauvignon (35.6 %) and 101-14 Mgt (29.9 %). This study found that MB induction was a fast and simple alternative for genetic transformation of grape cultivars. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6857 1573-5044 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11240-016-1023-4 |