Evaluation of capability of blast-induced ground vibration predictors considering measurement distance and different error measures

This study aims to investigate capability of the vibration prediction approaches, comprehensively. Field investigations were performed in a sandstone quarry. All the main conventional scaled distance equations were evaluated. A multivariate equation that contains blast design parameters was created...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental earth sciences 2019-07, Vol.78 (14), p.1-17, Article 421
Hauptverfasser: Hudaverdi, Turker, Akyildiz, Ozge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to investigate capability of the vibration prediction approaches, comprehensively. Field investigations were performed in a sandstone quarry. All the main conventional scaled distance equations were evaluated. A multivariate equation that contains blast design parameters was created by stepwise regression. A robust artificial neural network model was constructed. Effect of the additional parameters on success of the vibration estimation was examined. The success of the equations was evaluated considering the measurement distance. Evaluation of vibrations based on the measurement distance provided an opportunity to examine effectiveness of the equations that contains inelastic attenuation factor. Suitable error measures were investigated to examine the precision of vibration estimation. Both percentage errors and symmetric errors were found to be useful. Increase in the measurement distance was resulted in increase in prediction error. The classical scaled distance equations were found to be quite successful. The multivariate equation and artificial neural network model did not made better predictions than the scaled distance equations for long distance. The equations with inelastic attenuation formula do not have any advantage over classical scaled distance equations.
ISSN:1866-6280
1866-6299
DOI:10.1007/s12665-019-8427-5