Indicated trauma emergency department utilization – A comparison between patients’ self-assessment and professional evaluation

•Misuse of emergency departments in hospitals is a well-known problem.•Most patients assessed their case as urgent with moderate to high severity.•In contrast, ED staff rated less than a third of all patients as emergency cases.•ED staff believed that a significant portion of medical problems could...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International emergency nursing 2019-05, Vol.44, p.30-34
Hauptverfasser: Burchard, Rene, Oikonomoulas, Vasileios, Soost, Christian, Zoremba, Martin, Graw, Jan Adriaan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Misuse of emergency departments in hospitals is a well-known problem.•Most patients assessed their case as urgent with moderate to high severity.•In contrast, ED staff rated less than a third of all patients as emergency cases.•ED staff believed that a significant portion of medical problems could be treated by a GP. Patient visits to emergency departments (EDs) increase in many countries. As a result, these facilities are often congested and the socioeconomic burden of growing workload is a well-known problem. In this study, patients’ reasons attending an ED with non-emergent needs were analyzed. From October 2015 to March 2016 patients (n = 499), attending the ED of an academic teaching hospital without referral from a General Practitioner (GP) were surveyed regarding circumstances of their visit, a self-assessment of illness-severity, and reasons for choosing the ED instead of a GP. Results were compared to responses of ED staff (n = 40). Most patients assessed their case as urgent (patients: 65% vs. ED staff: 28%, p 
ISSN:1755-599X
1532-9267
1878-013X
DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2019.02.006