Supreme Court makes protection of product design trade dress more difficult
In March 2000, a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Brothers Inc. that product design trade dress that is not registered as a trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office is not subject to protection under US law, unless it can be established that the design had...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2001, Vol.29 (1), p.108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In March 2000, a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Brothers Inc. that product design trade dress that is not registered as a trademark with the US Patent and Trademark Office is not subject to protection under US law, unless it can be established that the design had acquired distinctiveness. According to the Court, product design trade dress can never be inherently distinctive. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0092-0703 1552-7824 |