Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act

Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act

Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana Inc. addresses whether a trade dress (the total image or packaging of a business) has to have acquired a secondary meaning to be inherently distinctive and therefore protectable under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. The Supreme Court ruled that the trade dress or the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.90
Hauptverfasser: King, Ernest W, Henthorne, Tony L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Brand image
Fast food industry
Lanham Act 1946-US
Supreme Court decisions
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
container_volume 22
creator King, Ernest W
Henthorne, Tony L
description Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana Inc. addresses whether a trade dress (the total image or packaging of a business) has to have acquired a secondary meaning to be inherently distinctive and therefore protectable under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. The Supreme Court ruled that the trade dress or the image of the business is protectable without establishing secondary meaning.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224863802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2248638023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKwjAQRYMoWB__MLgvxLTWuhRRFFy6L6EZbYpOdCYV_Hu78AOEC2dxDnegkuVqZdJ1afKhSrTemFSvdTZWE5FWa51nRZ6o-kQNMlK8f8B5iZ7q6N8Ika1DcIwi4AIKUIjA-Oo8Izw5hCv0E6wDOcsfeKAlTzfoyCFDbBDOlhr7gG0dZ2p0tXfB-Y9TtTjsL7tj2v-8OpRYtaFj6lVlTF4WWalN9lf0BbGPRyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224863802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>King, Ernest W ; Henthorne, Tony L</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Ernest W ; Henthorne, Tony L</creatorcontrib><description>Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana Inc. addresses whether a trade dress (the total image or packaging of a business) has to have acquired a secondary meaning to be inherently distinctive and therefore protectable under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. The Supreme Court ruled that the trade dress or the image of the business is protectable without establishing secondary meaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7824</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMSDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Brand image ; Fast food industry ; Lanham Act 1946-US ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.90</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Winter 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Ernest W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henthorne, Tony L</creatorcontrib><title>Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</title><description>Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana Inc. addresses whether a trade dress (the total image or packaging of a business) has to have acquired a secondary meaning to be inherently distinctive and therefore protectable under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. The Supreme Court ruled that the trade dress or the image of the business is protectable without establishing secondary meaning.</description><subject>Brand image</subject><subject>Fast food industry</subject><subject>Lanham Act 1946-US</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0092-0703</issn><issn>1552-7824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjMsKwjAQRYMoWB__MLgvxLTWuhRRFFy6L6EZbYpOdCYV_Hu78AOEC2dxDnegkuVqZdJ1afKhSrTemFSvdTZWE5FWa51nRZ6o-kQNMlK8f8B5iZ7q6N8Ika1DcIwi4AIKUIjA-Oo8Izw5hCv0E6wDOcsfeKAlTzfoyCFDbBDOlhr7gG0dZ2p0tXfB-Y9TtTjsL7tj2v-8OpRYtaFj6lVlTF4WWalN9lf0BbGPRyA</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>King, Ernest W</creator><creator>Henthorne, Tony L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act</title><author>King, Ernest W ; Henthorne, Tony L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2248638023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Brand image</topic><topic>Fast food industry</topic><topic>Lanham Act 1946-US</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Ernest W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henthorne, Tony L</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Ernest W</au><au>Henthorne, Tony L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><pages>90-</pages><issn>0092-0703</issn><eissn>1552-7824</eissn><coden>JAMSDE</coden><abstract>Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana Inc. addresses whether a trade dress (the total image or packaging of a business) has to have acquired a secondary meaning to be inherently distinctive and therefore protectable under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. The Supreme Court ruled that the trade dress or the image of the business is protectable without establishing secondary meaning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-0703
ispartof Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994-01, Vol.22 (1), p.90
issn 0092-0703
1552-7824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224863802
source SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Brand image
Fast food industry
Lanham Act 1946-US
Supreme Court decisions
title Inherently distinctive trade dress does not require proof of secondary meaning under the Lanham Act
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inherently%20distinctive%20trade%20dress%20does%20not%20require%20proof%20of%20secondary%20meaning%20under%20the%20Lanham%20Act&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Marketing%20Science&rft.au=King,%20Ernest%20W&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.pages=90-&rft.issn=0092-0703&rft.eissn=1552-7824&rft.coden=JAMSDE&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E37456%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224863802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true