668-P: A Coaching Intervention with Low Literacy Progress Report Improves Glycemic Control
Diabetes imposes a greater burden on minority and disadvantaged populations. Tailored interventions are needed to improve self-management outcomes among these populations. Purpose: To determine a) the effect of tailored coaching on patient knowledge, attitudes, and A1c and b) whether patient age, di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.68 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Diabetes imposes a greater burden on minority and disadvantaged populations. Tailored interventions are needed to improve self-management outcomes among these populations.
Purpose: To determine a) the effect of tailored coaching on patient knowledge, attitudes, and A1c and b) whether patient age, diabetes duration, or education level moderated intervention effect.
Methods: A pre-post efficacy analysis of a randomized patient coaching intervention in an urban diabetes clinic was conducted. Eligibility included diagnosed diabetes, A1c ≥ 7.0%, on insulin or high dose oral agents, at least two clinic visits in the prior year and at least four coaching sessions at ∼6-month intervals. Participants received either standard diabetes handouts (N=192) or one-on-one, low literacy tailored coaching (N=161). Coaching included review of home and clinic blood sugars/A1c using a color coded graphical printed progress report, goal setting and formulation of questions for the provider. Outcomes included A1c/blood sugar target knowledge, measured A1c, Diabetes Empowerment Scale scores, and Patient Activation Measure scores.
Results: Most participants were female (64%), black (96%), had household incomes < $15,000/year (83%), and had type 2 diabetes (96%). Mean age was 56.5 years and mean baseline A1c was 8.7%. Coaching increased knowledge of target A1c compared to control (OR 3.2, CI 1.6-6.2) but not knowledge of target blood sugar. Coaching improved measured A1c (-1.0% vs. -0.4% p < 0.05). The magnitude of improvement tended to be somewhat greater at higher educational levels (high school -0.97, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/db19-668-P |