Surgeries Conducted More Than a Year Before Patenting Found Not to Bar Patent on Surgical Method
In an important decision impacting life sciences patentees, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Barry v. Medtronic, Inc., affirmed a jury's finding that a doctor was not barred by § 102(b) from patenting a new surgical procedure, even though he performed that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intellectual property & technology law journal 2019-06, Vol.31 (6), p.21-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In an important decision impacting life sciences patentees, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Barry v. Medtronic, Inc., affirmed a jury's finding that a doctor was not barred by § 102(b) from patenting a new surgical procedure, even though he performed that surgery on three patients more than a year before applying for a patent. Katherine A. Helm, Noah M. Leibowitz, and Robert D. Rhoad, partners at Dechert LLP, discuss the case. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1534-3618 |