What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water

This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World archaeology 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237
1. Verfasser: Kamash, Zena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 2
container_start_page 224
container_title World archaeology
container_volume 40
creator Kamash, Zena
description This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00438240802008551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224096787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40388208</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40388208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAURUVoINNJf0AXBdNFyMbJk59kS1AoyZAvCDSLlC6NLD9nPHgsV9KQ5N9Hw5QsGpquJLjnXKTL2GcOJxwUnAIIVIVI1wJAScn32IyLCnKOlfzAZts8TwAesI8hrACgKDnO2PmvpYnZ0FPIGhrJxOX37I68pSn2bgyZ67K4pMyN0Q3uobdmyCbjTeuettGjieQP2X5nhkCf_pxz9vPy4n5xnd_-uLpZnN3mVkgd80Z0jZa6bYRCpAastoao4tC2UAqCkhrbgW4lr5RqGtlq1FqhlIhoRNvhnB3teifvfm8oxHrdB0vDYEZym1BjqSolsEjg8bsgB5RKC16WCf36F7pyGz-mb9RFWlOXlaoSxHeQ9S4ET109-X5t_HNqqrfr12_WT86XnbMK0flXQQAqVYBKebXL-7Fzfm0enR_aOprnwfnOm9H24W1rHZ9iMr_918R_P-wFLFGkbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224096787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kamash, Zena</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00438240802008551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Ancient civilization ; Archaeology ; baths ; Case studies ; Dams ; Death ; England ; Floods ; Inscriptions ; Iron age ; Middle East ; Ontology ; Paradoxes ; Public baths ; Ritual baths ; Roman ; Roman Empire ; Sea water ; Symbolism ; United Kingdom ; votive deposition ; Water ; Water pollution ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>World archaeology, 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2008</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Jun 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40388208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40388208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><title>World archaeology</title><description>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</description><subject>Ancient civilization</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>baths</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Inscriptions</subject><subject>Iron age</subject><subject>Middle East</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Public baths</subject><subject>Ritual baths</subject><subject>Roman</subject><subject>Roman Empire</subject><subject>Sea water</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>votive deposition</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0043-8243</issn><issn>1470-1375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAURUVoINNJf0AXBdNFyMbJk59kS1AoyZAvCDSLlC6NLD9nPHgsV9KQ5N9Hw5QsGpquJLjnXKTL2GcOJxwUnAIIVIVI1wJAScn32IyLCnKOlfzAZts8TwAesI8hrACgKDnO2PmvpYnZ0FPIGhrJxOX37I68pSn2bgyZ67K4pMyN0Q3uobdmyCbjTeuettGjieQP2X5nhkCf_pxz9vPy4n5xnd_-uLpZnN3mVkgd80Z0jZa6bYRCpAastoao4tC2UAqCkhrbgW4lr5RqGtlq1FqhlIhoRNvhnB3teifvfm8oxHrdB0vDYEZym1BjqSolsEjg8bsgB5RKC16WCf36F7pyGz-mb9RFWlOXlaoSxHeQ9S4ET109-X5t_HNqqrfr12_WT86XnbMK0flXQQAqVYBKebXL-7Fzfm0enR_aOprnwfnOm9H24W1rHZ9iMr_918R_P-wFLFGkbQ</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Kamash, Zena</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><author>Kamash, Zena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilization</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>baths</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Inscriptions</topic><topic>Iron age</topic><topic>Middle East</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Public baths</topic><topic>Ritual baths</topic><topic>Roman</topic><topic>Roman Empire</topic><topic>Sea water</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>votive deposition</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World archaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamash, Zena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</atitle><jtitle>World archaeology</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>224-237</pages><issn>0043-8243</issn><eissn>1470-1375</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00438240802008551</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-8243
ispartof World archaeology, 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237
issn 0043-8243
1470-1375
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224096787
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Ancient civilization
Archaeology
baths
Case studies
Dams
Death
England
Floods
Inscriptions
Iron age
Middle East
Ontology
Paradoxes
Public baths
Ritual baths
Roman
Roman Empire
Sea water
Symbolism
United Kingdom
votive deposition
Water
Water pollution
Water quality
title What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20lies%20beneath?%20Perceptions%20of%20the%20ontological%20paradox%20of%20water&rft.jtitle=World%20archaeology&rft.au=Kamash,%20Zena&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=224-237&rft.issn=0043-8243&rft.eissn=1470-1375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00438240802008551&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40388208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224096787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40388208&rfr_iscdi=true