What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water
This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this ass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World archaeology 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 237 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | World archaeology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Kamash, Zena |
description | This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00438240802008551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224096787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40388208</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40388208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAURUVoINNJf0AXBdNFyMbJk59kS1AoyZAvCDSLlC6NLD9nPHgsV9KQ5N9Hw5QsGpquJLjnXKTL2GcOJxwUnAIIVIVI1wJAScn32IyLCnKOlfzAZts8TwAesI8hrACgKDnO2PmvpYnZ0FPIGhrJxOX37I68pSn2bgyZ67K4pMyN0Q3uobdmyCbjTeuettGjieQP2X5nhkCf_pxz9vPy4n5xnd_-uLpZnN3mVkgd80Z0jZa6bYRCpAastoao4tC2UAqCkhrbgW4lr5RqGtlq1FqhlIhoRNvhnB3teifvfm8oxHrdB0vDYEZym1BjqSolsEjg8bsgB5RKC16WCf36F7pyGz-mb9RFWlOXlaoSxHeQ9S4ET109-X5t_HNqqrfr12_WT86XnbMK0flXQQAqVYBKebXL-7Fzfm0enR_aOprnwfnOm9H24W1rHZ9iMr_918R_P-wFLFGkbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224096787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kamash, Zena</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00438240802008551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Ancient civilization ; Archaeology ; baths ; Case studies ; Dams ; Death ; England ; Floods ; Inscriptions ; Iron age ; Middle East ; Ontology ; Paradoxes ; Public baths ; Ritual baths ; Roman ; Roman Empire ; Sea water ; Symbolism ; United Kingdom ; votive deposition ; Water ; Water pollution ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>World archaeology, 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2008</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Taylor & Francis</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Jun 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40388208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40388208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><title>World archaeology</title><description>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</description><subject>Ancient civilization</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>baths</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Inscriptions</subject><subject>Iron age</subject><subject>Middle East</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Public baths</subject><subject>Ritual baths</subject><subject>Roman</subject><subject>Roman Empire</subject><subject>Sea water</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>votive deposition</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0043-8243</issn><issn>1470-1375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAURUVoINNJf0AXBdNFyMbJk59kS1AoyZAvCDSLlC6NLD9nPHgsV9KQ5N9Hw5QsGpquJLjnXKTL2GcOJxwUnAIIVIVI1wJAScn32IyLCnKOlfzAZts8TwAesI8hrACgKDnO2PmvpYnZ0FPIGhrJxOX37I68pSn2bgyZ67K4pMyN0Q3uobdmyCbjTeuettGjieQP2X5nhkCf_pxz9vPy4n5xnd_-uLpZnN3mVkgd80Z0jZa6bYRCpAastoao4tC2UAqCkhrbgW4lr5RqGtlq1FqhlIhoRNvhnB3teifvfm8oxHrdB0vDYEZym1BjqSolsEjg8bsgB5RKC16WCf36F7pyGz-mb9RFWlOXlaoSxHeQ9S4ET109-X5t_HNqqrfr12_WT86XnbMK0flXQQAqVYBKebXL-7Fzfm0enR_aOprnwfnOm9H24W1rHZ9iMr_918R_P-wFLFGkbQ</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Kamash, Zena</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</title><author>Kamash, Zena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-b4fb959db4833eb0c9caee710dd064e06ebcf09d51788bb5d93998355333a4df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilization</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>baths</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Inscriptions</topic><topic>Iron age</topic><topic>Middle East</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Public baths</topic><topic>Ritual baths</topic><topic>Roman</topic><topic>Roman Empire</topic><topic>Sea water</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>votive deposition</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamash, Zena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World archaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamash, Zena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water</atitle><jtitle>World archaeology</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>224-237</pages><issn>0043-8243</issn><eissn>1470-1375</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses the paradox that the element water is both vital to life and yet can also kill. It is argued that this paradox was more apparent to humans than is often assumed in the modern Western world where water is usually viewed as pure and cleansing. This paper attempts to break this assumption down using three case studies. The first two use evidence from the imagery and inscriptions associated with dams and bathhouses in the Roman Near East to analyse the potential of water to flood and pollute. The third explores how votive deposition was linked conceptually to the transmutable, liminal nature of water, focusing on the Roman rural religious centre at Marcham/Frilford, England. These examples are used to illustrate the complex negotiations with the inherent paradox of water, which are manifested in protective symbols (to prevent flooding, illness and death) and votive deposition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00438240802008551</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-8243 |
ispartof | World archaeology, 2008-06, Vol.40 (2), p.224-237 |
issn | 0043-8243 1470-1375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224096787 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Ancient civilization Archaeology baths Case studies Dams Death England Floods Inscriptions Iron age Middle East Ontology Paradoxes Public baths Ritual baths Roman Roman Empire Sea water Symbolism United Kingdom votive deposition Water Water pollution Water quality |
title | What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20lies%20beneath?%20Perceptions%20of%20the%20ontological%20paradox%20of%20water&rft.jtitle=World%20archaeology&rft.au=Kamash,%20Zena&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=224-237&rft.issn=0043-8243&rft.eissn=1470-1375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00438240802008551&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40388208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224096787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40388208&rfr_iscdi=true |