Adding Insult to Injury: Questioning the Role of Dignity in Conceptions of Sovereignty

Adding Insult to Injury: Questioning the Role of Dignity in Conceptions of Sovereignty

The use of the term "dignity" in sovereignty discussions ought neither to be dismissed nor embraced without puzzling about its deployment as the 21st-century begins. Resnik and Suk explored the role that the term plays in US constitutional law by scanning 200 years of decision-making by th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stanford law review 2003-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1921-1962
Hauptverfasser: Resnik, Judith, Suk, Julie Chi-hye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Analysis
Countries
Dignity
Federalism
Government
Human dignity
Human rights
Immunity
International law
Jurisdiction
Political aspects
Sovereign states
Sovereignty
Supreme Court decisions
Treaties
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The use of the term "dignity" in sovereignty discussions ought neither to be dismissed nor embraced without puzzling about its deployment as the 21st-century begins. Resnik and Suk explored the role that the term plays in US constitutional law by scanning 200 years of decision-making by the Supreme Court.
ISSN:0038-9765
1939-8581