Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Setting of Budget Constraints — Is It Equitable?
Budget constraints increasingly determine the provision of health care services. One of the promises of cost-effectiveness analysis is that it can demonstrate how to maximize the health care benefits attainable within a specific budget. 1 , 2 Despite this promise, cost-effectiveness analysis has bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1996-05, Vol.334 (18), p.1174-1177 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Budget constraints increasingly determine the provision of health care services. One of the promises of cost-effectiveness analysis is that it can demonstrate how to maximize the health care benefits attainable within a specific budget.
1
,
2
Despite this promise, cost-effectiveness analysis has been criticized for setting health care priorities in a way that violates people's values.
3
–
5
For example, many people value equity in the distribution of health care resources, yet equity is not accounted for in cost-effectiveness analyses.
6
–
13
A basic assumption of cost-effectiveness analysis is that one should always prefer a health care intervention that provides a population with . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199605023341807 |