Age Is Not a Limiting Factor for Midurethral Sling Procedures in the Elderly with Urinary Incontinence

Objective: The object was to evaluate clinical outcome of the midurethral sling procedures in the elderly compared with middle-aged women. Methods: A total of 266 women who underwent midurethral sling procedures with at least follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. Patients were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2006-01, Vol.61 (4), p.194-199
Hauptverfasser: Ku, Ja Hyeon, Oh, Jin Gyu, Shin, Jae Wook, Kim, Soo Woong, Paick, Jae-Seung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The object was to evaluate clinical outcome of the midurethral sling procedures in the elderly compared with middle-aged women. Methods: A total of 266 women who underwent midurethral sling procedures with at least follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. Patients were divided as the elderly group (65 years old or older, n = 60) and the middle-aged group (45–64 years old, n = 206). Results: Although postoperative urge symptoms were more prevalent in the elderly group (25.0%) than in the middle-aged group (6.3%), there were no significant differences between the two groups for the rates of postoperative urge incontinence (p = 0.159). Stress incontinence was cured by 91.3% in the middle-aged group and 85.0% in the elderly group, respectively (p = 0.158). Conclusions: Age does not seem to be a significant risk factor for failure of midurethral sling procedures.
ISSN:0378-7346
1423-002X
DOI:10.1159/000091321