Jennifer Egan's Dive for the Inarticulate
Forty years ago, the poet and literary critic William Harmon distinguished between two ways in which language can fail. Writing in these pages, Harmon observed that speechlessness and silences can be markers of frustration, incapacity, and failed connections. Think of the disjointed language of Will...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PMLA : Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 2019-03, Vol.134 (2), p.412-415 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Forty years ago, the poet and literary critic William Harmon distinguished between two ways in which language can fail. Writing in these pages, Harmon observed that speechlessness and silences can be markers of frustration, incapacity, and failed connections. Think of the disjointed language of William Faulkner's Benjy Compson in
The Sound and the Fury
or, more recently, the silences of the ghostly character Given who haunts Jesmyn Ward's
Sing, Unburied, Sing.
Alternatively, spaces beyond the horizons of language can embody a tranquility so thorough and full of meaning that words would mar the perfection of the moment. In this second sense, inarticulateness is a point of peace and stillness toward which language is at best a clumsy passage. Harmon contended that in the twenty years between the world wars the poetry of T.S. Eliot shifted from the first sense of inarticulateness to the second (450). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-8129 1938-1530 |
DOI: | 10.1632/pmla.2019.134.2.412 |