To the Editor/Professor Guck replies
To mention only one, Schenker writes, regarding his example 71, from the Menuett of Mozart's G-minor String Quintet K. 516, that "it is the scale-degree progression bII-3IV that is responsible for the diminished fourth in the second violin (ab^sub 1^-e^sub 1^)"; it is true that the na...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Music theory spectrum 2007-10, Vol.29 (2), p.276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To mention only one, Schenker writes, regarding his example 71, from the Menuett of Mozart's G-minor String Quintet K. 516, that "it is the scale-degree progression bII-3IV that is responsible for the diminished fourth in the second violin (ab^sub 1^-e^sub 1^)"; it is true that the named scale-degree progression does not itself necessitate a diminished-fourth leap, but the reader is quite reasonably expected to have in memory a vivid aural image of a previously established thematic descending fourth that has here, thanks precisely to the phrygian II, become inflected from perfect to diminished. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-6167 1533-8339 |