To the Editor/Professor Guck replies

To mention only one, Schenker writes, regarding his example 71, from the Menuett of Mozart's G-minor String Quintet K. 516, that "it is the scale-degree progression bII-3IV that is responsible for the diminished fourth in the second violin (ab^sub 1^-e^sub 1^)"; it is true that the na...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Music theory spectrum 2007-10, Vol.29 (2), p.276
Hauptverfasser: Rothgeb, John, Guck, Marion
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To mention only one, Schenker writes, regarding his example 71, from the Menuett of Mozart's G-minor String Quintet K. 516, that "it is the scale-degree progression bII-3IV that is responsible for the diminished fourth in the second violin (ab^sub 1^-e^sub 1^)"; it is true that the named scale-degree progression does not itself necessitate a diminished-fourth leap, but the reader is quite reasonably expected to have in memory a vivid aural image of a previously established thematic descending fourth that has here, thanks precisely to the phrygian II, become inflected from perfect to diminished.
ISSN:0195-6167
1533-8339