On the relative strengths of fragments of collection
Let M be the basic set theory that consists of the axioms of extensionality, emptyset, pair, union, powerset, infinity, transitive containment, Δ0‐separation and set foundation. This paper studies the relative strength of set theories obtained by adding fragments of the set‐theoretic collection sche...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mathematical logic quarterly 2019-05, Vol.65 (1), p.80-94 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Let M be the basic set theory that consists of the axioms of extensionality, emptyset, pair, union, powerset, infinity, transitive containment, Δ0‐separation and set foundation. This paper studies the relative strength of set theories obtained by adding fragments of the set‐theoretic collection scheme to M. We focus on two common parameterisations of the collection: Πn‐collection, which is the usual collection scheme restricted to Πn‐formulae, and strong Πn‐collection, which is equivalent to Πn‐collection plus Σn+1‐separation. The main result of this paper shows that for all n≥1,
M+Πn+1− collection +Σn+2− inductionon ω proves that there exists a transitive model of Zermelo Set Theory plus Πn‐collection,
the theory M+Πn+1− collection is Πn+3‐conservative over the theory M+ strong Πn− collection .
It is also shown that (2) holds for n=0 when the Axiom of Choice is included in the base theory. The final section indicates how the proofs of (1) and (2) can be modified to obtain analogues of these results for theories obtained by adding fragments of collection to a base theory (Kripke‐Platek Set Theory with Infinity plus V=L) that does not include the powerset axiom. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0942-5616 1521-3870 |
DOI: | 10.1002/malq.201800044 |