David Elkins Responds

David Elkins Responds

Elkins responds to Paul Wong's commentary on his article, Critique of the Medical Model (2009a). Here, he points out the issues in which they agree and disagree about the humanistic-existential psychology. Moreover, he discusses what the humanistic-existential psychology's posture should b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of humanistic psychology 2010-04, Vol.50 (2), p.256-263
1. Verfasser: Elkins, David N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clinical psychology
Discourse analysis
Influence
Perceptions
Power
Wong, Paul
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Elkins responds to Paul Wong's commentary on his article, Critique of the Medical Model (2009a). Here, he points out the issues in which they agree and disagree about the humanistic-existential psychology. Moreover, he discusses what the humanistic-existential psychology's posture should be toward the mainstream clinical psychology and medical model. Also, he examines the reasons why the humanistic-existential psychology lose its power and influence in American psychology.
ISSN:0022-1678
1552-650X
DOI:10.1177/0022167809355195