Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia

•Knowledge of effective biosecurity risk management practice differs between growers.•Trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt biosecurity information.•Programs fostering affinitive, rational and procedural trust may improve biosecurity outcomes.•Knowledge brokers may facilitate sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of rural studies 2019-04, Vol.67, p.101-110
Hauptverfasser:	Maclean, K., Farbotko, C., Robinson, C.J.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Agribusiness Agricultural economics Agricultural industry Agricultural production Agriculture Agronomy Biosecurity Central government Community organizations Decision making Disease Disease control Environmental management Environmental risk Farmers Free trade Governance Government agencies Government industry relations Health problems Information needs Information sources Insight Integrals International standards International trade Introduced species Invasive species Judgments Knowledge Narratives Natural environment Natural resource management Natural resources Negotiation Negotiations Participation Partnerships Pests Productivity Protection Public administration Resource management Risk management Risk perception Rural communities Rural environments Social analysis Trust
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	•Knowledge of effective biosecurity risk management practice differs between growers.•Trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt biosecurity information.•Programs fostering affinitive, rational and procedural trust may improve biosecurity outcomes.•Knowledge brokers may facilitate sharing/exchange/co-production between diverse actors.
ISSN:	0743-0167 1873-1392
DOI:	10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026