Comments on the Measurement of Halo

The most frequently used measures of halo are based on interdimension correlations (the correlation, or r, measure) or within-ratee variability across dimensions (the standard deviation, or SD, measure). Pulakos, Schmitt, and Ostroff argued that the r measure is conceptually appropriate and demonstr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 1994-06, Vol.54 (2), p.366-371
Hauptverfasser: Fisicaro, Sebastiano A., Vance, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The most frequently used measures of halo are based on interdimension correlations (the correlation, or r, measure) or within-ratee variability across dimensions (the standard deviation, or SD, measure). Pulakos, Schmitt, and Ostroff argued that the r measure is conceptually appropriate and demonstrated that the SD measure does not always yield results consistent with the r measure. They therefore concluded that the SD measure should not be used. This article critiques the r measure, responds to criticisms of the SD measure, and describes conditions under which halo effects can occur and (a) both measures can be obtained, (b) one of the measures can be obtained, but the other measure either cannot be obtained or should not be used, and (c) neither measure can be obtained. Thus neither measure is uniformly superior to the other. It is therefore recommended that both measures be obtained when possible and when there is no basis for selecting one over the other.
ISSN:0013-1644
1552-3888
DOI:10.1177/0013164494054002010