Commentary: advancing marketing strategy in the marketing discipline and beyond

Shelby Hunt provides an insightful, precise essay on the nature and contribution of the field of marketing across five distinct periods and concludes with a discussion of the potential for the field of marketing, both within marketing and across allied fields of management. This 'promise' of marketing's academic future is followed by a discussion of the key factors likely to play a significant role in lessening the contribution of the field. The purpose of this commentary is to focus on Hunt's key question regarding Era V: Is the future of the marketing discipline promising or problematic? As such, this commentary addresses four issues: (1) the 'promising' assets that the discipline has in play; (2) the slide towards academic irrelevance and, thus, the 'problem'; (3) Hunt's observations on how the slide might be reversed; and (4) my viewpoint on what can be done to reverse the slide.