Dose to the interventional radiologist in CTF-guided procedures

The aim of this work was to assess the occupational dose received by an interventional radiologist (IR) during computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided procedures; to identify the most exposed areas of the body including the hands and fingers; to suggest recommendations for individual monitoring...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation and environmental biophysics 2019-08, Vol.58 (3), p.373-384
Hauptverfasser: Alves, J. G., Sarmento, S., Pereira, J. S., Pereira, M. F., Sousa, M. J., Cunha, L., Dias, A., Oliveira, A. D., Cardoso, J. V., Santos, L. M., Lencart, J., Gouvêa, M., Santos, J. A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this work was to assess the occupational dose received by an interventional radiologist (IR) during computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided procedures; to identify the most exposed areas of the body including the hands and fingers; to suggest recommendations for individual monitoring; and to improve radiation safety of the practice. A total of 53 CTF-guided procedures were studied. Twelve whole-body dosimeters were worn by the IR in each procedure for the assessment of the personal dose equivalent, H p (10), on the chest, waist, and back, both over and under the lead apron, as well as the personal dose equivalent, H p (0.07), on both arms, knees, and feet. Special gloves with casings to fit extremity dosimeters were prepared to assess H p (0.07) to the fingers. The measured chest dose values were higher than those on the waist and back; the dominant hand or the left side was the most exposed. In general, the ring, middle, and index fingers of the dominant hand were the most exposed (maximum in the 36–39 mSv range), while wrist dose was negligible compared to finger doses. Based on the results obtained the following recommendations are suggested: protective devices (lead aprons, thyroid shield, and goggles) should be worn; H p (10) should be assessed at the chest level both above and below the lead apron; finger doses can be measured on the basis of each middle finger; the arm closer to the beam should be monitored; and finally, a wrist dosimeter will not provide useful information.
ISSN:0301-634X
1432-2099
DOI:10.1007/s00411-019-00792-3