Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing
Measuring people and understanding how and why they reach the conclusions they do is made all the more difficult because they frequently cannot tell you how and why they got there themselves. And it is even more perplexing when applied to juries. Then the task is no longer to understand one person,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Defense counsel journal 1998-07, Vol.65 (3), p.408 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 408 |
| container_title | Defense counsel journal |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Sobus, Mark S |
| description | Measuring people and understanding how and why they reach the conclusions they do is made all the more difficult because they frequently cannot tell you how and why they got there themselves. And it is even more perplexing when applied to juries. Then the task is no longer to understand one person, but several people, as well as the interactions among them. While understanding juries will never be easy, trained litigation strategists employ several techniques to increase the confidence associated with drawing conclusions about the underlying process for the person and the group. One important technique in this process is to focus on juror and issue commensurability. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220672494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A58726642</galeid><sourcerecordid>A58726642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1294-fceb6dda6bd197433fbb9a95a8ea561cca6db88a0db097db813d8b428be2f85f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjk1LxDAQhoMouK7-h-LZQpq0aeJtWfyCRS96LvmY1JQ20aQ97L83i4KCO3OY4eFh3jlBK0JbVlKB2SlaYS6aEuOKnaOLlAaci_J2hZ63YZrApyVK5UY372-LxRuIaZbeON8XwxL3RYQEMur3IsMDCbFw3oY4ydkFX3zEoCGlrF-iMyvHBFc_c43e7u9et4_l7uXhabvZlX1FRF1aDYoZI5kylWhrSq1SQopGcpANq7SWzCjOJTYKizavFTVc1YQrIJY3lq7R9ffdHP25QJq7ISzR58iOEMxaUov6V-rlCN3h4TlKPbmku03DW8JYTbJ0c0TqwUOUY_BgXcZ_9fKIntvA5PR__wurfHgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220672494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Sobus, Mark S</creator><creatorcontrib>Sobus, Mark S</creatorcontrib><description>Measuring people and understanding how and why they reach the conclusions they do is made all the more difficult because they frequently cannot tell you how and why they got there themselves. And it is even more perplexing when applied to juries. Then the task is no longer to understand one person, but several people, as well as the interactions among them. While understanding juries will never be easy, trained litigation strategists employ several techniques to increase the confidence associated with drawing conclusions about the underlying process for the person and the group. One important technique in this process is to focus on juror and issue commensurability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-0016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-3906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: International Association of Defense Counsels</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Information processing ; Juries ; Jury ; Jury members ; Methods ; Organizational behavior ; Psychological aspects ; Trial practice</subject><ispartof>Defense counsel journal, 1998-07, Vol.65 (3), p.408</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 International Association of Defense Counsels</rights><rights>Copyright International Association of Defense Counsel Jul 1998</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sobus, Mark S</creatorcontrib><title>Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing</title><title>Defense counsel journal</title><description>Measuring people and understanding how and why they reach the conclusions they do is made all the more difficult because they frequently cannot tell you how and why they got there themselves. And it is even more perplexing when applied to juries. Then the task is no longer to understand one person, but several people, as well as the interactions among them. While understanding juries will never be easy, trained litigation strategists employ several techniques to increase the confidence associated with drawing conclusions about the underlying process for the person and the group. One important technique in this process is to focus on juror and issue commensurability.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Jury</subject><subject>Jury members</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Trial practice</subject><issn>0895-0016</issn><issn>2376-3906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptjk1LxDAQhoMouK7-h-LZQpq0aeJtWfyCRS96LvmY1JQ20aQ97L83i4KCO3OY4eFh3jlBK0JbVlKB2SlaYS6aEuOKnaOLlAaci_J2hZ63YZrApyVK5UY372-LxRuIaZbeON8XwxL3RYQEMur3IsMDCbFw3oY4ydkFX3zEoCGlrF-iMyvHBFc_c43e7u9et4_l7uXhabvZlX1FRF1aDYoZI5kylWhrSq1SQopGcpANq7SWzCjOJTYKizavFTVc1YQrIJY3lq7R9ffdHP25QJq7ISzR58iOEMxaUov6V-rlCN3h4TlKPbmku03DW8JYTbJ0c0TqwUOUY_BgXcZ_9fKIntvA5PR__wurfHgM</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Sobus, Mark S</creator><general>International Association of Defense Counsels</general><general>International Association of Defense Counsel</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing</title><author>Sobus, Mark S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1294-fceb6dda6bd197433fbb9a95a8ea561cca6db88a0db097db813d8b428be2f85f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Jury</topic><topic>Jury members</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Trial practice</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sobus, Mark S</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sobus, Mark S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing</atitle><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>408</spage><pages>408-</pages><issn>0895-0016</issn><eissn>2376-3906</eissn><abstract>Measuring people and understanding how and why they reach the conclusions they do is made all the more difficult because they frequently cannot tell you how and why they got there themselves. And it is even more perplexing when applied to juries. Then the task is no longer to understand one person, but several people, as well as the interactions among them. While understanding juries will never be easy, trained litigation strategists employ several techniques to increase the confidence associated with drawing conclusions about the underlying process for the person and the group. One important technique in this process is to focus on juror and issue commensurability.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>International Association of Defense Counsels</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0895-0016 |
| ispartof | Defense counsel journal, 1998-07, Vol.65 (3), p.408 |
| issn | 0895-0016 2376-3906 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220672494 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Decision making Information processing Juries Jury Jury members Methods Organizational behavior Psychological aspects Trial practice |
| title | Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commensurability:%20understanding%20jury%20research%20and%20juror%20information%20processing&rft.jtitle=Defense%20counsel%20journal&rft.au=Sobus,%20Mark%20S&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=408&rft.pages=408-&rft.issn=0895-0016&rft.eissn=2376-3906&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA58726642%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220672494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A58726642&rfr_iscdi=true |