Continuing the discussion of international education in the 'Global South': A Cambridge perspective
Introduction This article responds to a piece written by Tristian Bunnell (2017), who argues that a more concrete definition of the Global North/South is needed to better connect post-colonial theory with the current state of international education. Using membership in the Organisation for Economic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The International schools journal 2018-11, Vol.38 (1), p.67-75 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction This article responds to a piece written by Tristian Bunnell (2017), who argues that a more concrete definition of the Global North/South is needed to better connect post-colonial theory with the current state of international education. Using membership in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Group of 77 (G77) as determinants for classification in the Global North/ South, Bunnell collects data related to the number of International Baccalaureate (IB) schools in each respected group. [...]unlike Cambridge, the IB's historical origins are not rooted in traditional colonialism. [...]4,718 Cambridge schools were included in this data set, which differs from the over 10,000 Cambridge claims to be affiliated with the organisation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0264-7281 |