Low Levels of Endostatin in the Urine from Patients with Malignant Disease

Endostatin, a C-terminal subfragment of collagen XVIII, and angiostatin, a family of fragments originating from the NH 2 -terminal portion of plasminogen, have been described as potent inhibitors of angiogenesis and malignant growth. We have earlier reported the presence of angiostatin fragments in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tumor biology 2002-07, Vol.23 (4), p.222-227
Hauptverfasser: Linder-Stragliotto, Christina, Strander, Hans, Munck-Wikland, Eva, Sten-Linder, Margareta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Endostatin, a C-terminal subfragment of collagen XVIII, and angiostatin, a family of fragments originating from the NH 2 -terminal portion of plasminogen, have been described as potent inhibitors of angiogenesis and malignant growth. We have earlier reported the presence of angiostatin fragments in urine from cancer patients. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of endostatin and the correlation between the amounts of endostatin and angiostatin in urine collected from 104 patients with different types of malignancies and in 16 controls. The amounts of endostatin were measured with a commercial immunoassay. Angiostatin fragments were quantitated by Western blot analysis. Only small amounts of endostatin were observed, both in patients and controls, and there was no significant difference in the amount of endostatin between the patients and the controls. Both endostatin and angiostatin concentrations in the urine showed a strong dependence on impaired kidney function, especially tubulus function, measured as the amount of urine α 1 -microglobulin. Interestingly, there was no significant correlation between endostatin and angiostatin concentrations in the patients with impaired kidney function (elevated urine albumin or urine α 1 -microglobulin), suggesting a possible difference in circulating concentrations of these inhibitors.
ISSN:1010-4283
1423-0380
DOI:10.1159/000067256