A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY
A technique was developed which provided a quantitative index of the fit between training curriculum content and job task performance requirements. The procedure also generates a listing of tasks which receive undue emphasis in the training curriculum, those which are not being trained, and those wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personnel psychology 1985-03, Vol.38 (1), p.117-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 131 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Personnel psychology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | BOWNAS, DAVID A. BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J. DONNELLY, LAURA F. |
description | A technique was developed which provided a quantitative index of the fit between training curriculum content and job task performance requirements. The procedure also generates a listing of tasks which receive undue emphasis in the training curriculum, those which are not being trained, and those which instructors intend to train, but which course graduates report being unable to perform. The procedure is illustrated for three training programs in the U.S. Coast Guard Class ‘A’ schools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220131679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1304553183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4127-ee4f9512e8a61d6318d06f9958cf20fe0f151f09a1c3939e39d03b6fac24b2863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDxGsUzx-JWaDTAglUkhDmxTBxkpTW2p5FJIi2r_HUSt2LJjNjGbuPSNdhM4A98HVxaIPAWO-4IFbyJD3V1OMOWP99R7q_Z72UQ9jCj4PiThER227wK4IC3torLyHUmVFUqgimcSeyvPRUEV3XjH04olKS7fOBl4xUknWDVE5GiVRmZb3XjTMijgrvLG6z9Pupm5ix4qeTtCBrV5bc7rrx6i8jYvozk-HgyRSqV8zIIFvDLOSAzFhJWAmKIQzLKyUPKwtwdZgCxwslhXUVFJpqJxhOhW2qgmbklDQY3S25X40y88v0670YvnVvLuXmhAMFEQgnej8LxFQzDh3f6lTXW5VdbNs28ZY_dHM36pmowHrLmm90F2cuotTd0nrXdJ67cxXW_P3_NVs_uHUeZyPAQJH8LeEebsy619C1bxoEdCA68dsoB8YDp_H1xMt6Q_2goxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304553183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>BOWNAS, DAVID A. ; BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J. ; DONNELLY, LAURA F.</creator><creatorcontrib>BOWNAS, DAVID A. ; BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J. ; DONNELLY, LAURA F.</creatorcontrib><description>A technique was developed which provided a quantitative index of the fit between training curriculum content and job task performance requirements. The procedure also generates a listing of tasks which receive undue emphasis in the training curriculum, those which are not being trained, and those which instructors intend to train, but which course graduates report being unable to perform. The procedure is illustrated for three training programs in the U.S. Coast Guard Class ‘A’ schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Correlation analysis ; Curricula ; Job Performance ; Job requirements ; Reliability ; Studies ; Training</subject><ispartof>Personnel psychology, 1985-03, Vol.38 (1), p.117-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright Personnel Psychology, Inc. Spring 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4127-ee4f9512e8a61d6318d06f9958cf20fe0f151f09a1c3939e39d03b6fac24b2863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4127-ee4f9512e8a61d6318d06f9958cf20fe0f151f09a1c3939e39d03b6fac24b2863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOWNAS, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONNELLY, LAURA F.</creatorcontrib><title>A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY</title><title>Personnel psychology</title><description>A technique was developed which provided a quantitative index of the fit between training curriculum content and job task performance requirements. The procedure also generates a listing of tasks which receive undue emphasis in the training curriculum, those which are not being trained, and those which instructors intend to train, but which course graduates report being unable to perform. The procedure is illustrated for three training programs in the U.S. Coast Guard Class ‘A’ schools.</description><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job requirements</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0031-5826</issn><issn>1744-6570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxDxGsUzx-JWaDTAglUkhDmxTBxkpTW2p5FJIi2r_HUSt2LJjNjGbuPSNdhM4A98HVxaIPAWO-4IFbyJD3V1OMOWP99R7q_Z72UQ9jCj4PiThER227wK4IC3torLyHUmVFUqgimcSeyvPRUEV3XjH04olKS7fOBl4xUknWDVE5GiVRmZb3XjTMijgrvLG6z9Pupm5ix4qeTtCBrV5bc7rrx6i8jYvozk-HgyRSqV8zIIFvDLOSAzFhJWAmKIQzLKyUPKwtwdZgCxwslhXUVFJpqJxhOhW2qgmbklDQY3S25X40y88v0670YvnVvLuXmhAMFEQgnej8LxFQzDh3f6lTXW5VdbNs28ZY_dHM36pmowHrLmm90F2cuotTd0nrXdJ67cxXW_P3_NVs_uHUeZyPAQJH8LeEebsy619C1bxoEdCA68dsoB8YDp_H1xMt6Q_2goxA</recordid><startdate>198503</startdate><enddate>198503</enddate><creator>BOWNAS, DAVID A.</creator><creator>BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J.</creator><creator>DONNELLY, LAURA F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Personnel Psychology, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>4T-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198503</creationdate><title>A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY</title><author>BOWNAS, DAVID A. ; BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J. ; DONNELLY, LAURA F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4127-ee4f9512e8a61d6318d06f9958cf20fe0f151f09a1c3939e39d03b6fac24b2863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job requirements</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOWNAS, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONNELLY, LAURA F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOWNAS, DAVID A.</au><au>BOSSHARDT, MICHAEL J.</au><au>DONNELLY, LAURA F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY</atitle><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle><date>1985-03</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>117-131</pages><issn>0031-5826</issn><eissn>1744-6570</eissn><abstract>A technique was developed which provided a quantitative index of the fit between training curriculum content and job task performance requirements. The procedure also generates a listing of tasks which receive undue emphasis in the training curriculum, those which are not being trained, and those which instructors intend to train, but which course graduates report being unable to perform. The procedure is illustrated for three training programs in the U.S. Coast Guard Class ‘A’ schools.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-5826 |
ispartof | Personnel psychology, 1985-03, Vol.38 (1), p.117-131 |
issn | 0031-5826 1744-6570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220131679 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Correlation analysis Curricula Job Performance Job requirements Reliability Studies Training |
title | A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO EVALUATING TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT SAMPLING ADEQUACY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A24%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20QUANTITATIVE%20APPROACH%20TO%20EVALUATING%20TRAINING%20CURRICULUM%20CONTENT%20SAMPLING%20ADEQUACY&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20psychology&rft.au=BOWNAS,%20DAVID%20A.&rft.date=1985-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=117-131&rft.issn=0031-5826&rft.eissn=1744-6570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00544.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1304553183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304553183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |