Effect of copolymers containing glycidyl methacrylate functional groups on the rheological, mechanical, and morphological properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of ethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate (EGMA) and ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate (EMAGMA) copolymers on the rheological, mechanical, and morphological properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The results of torque rheometry showe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer engineering and science 2019-04, Vol.59 (4), p.683-693
Hauptverfasser: do Nascimento, Walber Alexandre, Agrawal, Pankaj, de Mélo, Tomás Jeferson Alves
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of ethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate (EGMA) and ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate (EMAGMA) copolymers on the rheological, mechanical, and morphological properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The results of torque rheometry showed an increase in the torque of PET with the addition of EGMA and EMAGMA copolymers due to the reactions between the GMA groups present in the copolymers and the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups present in PET. The torque of PET/copolymer blends increased with the increase in the copolymer content and was more pronounced for the blends containing EGMA copolymer. X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry analyzes showed that neat PET and the PET in PET/copolymer blends are amorphous. The addition of EGMA and EMAGMA copolymers delayed the crystallization of PET. Rheological measurements showed an increase in the viscosity at low frequencies with the addition of EGMA and EMAGMA copolymers to PET. This increase was more pronounced for PET/copolymer blends containing higher amount of copolymers and for the blends containing EGMA, corroborating the results obtained by torque rheometry. The impact strength of PET/EMAGMA blends was higher than that of PET/EGMA blends. Morphology analysis by SEM showed that PET/EMAGMA blends presented higher average dispersed phase domains size than PET/EGMA blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:683–693, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
ISSN:0032-3888
1548-2634
DOI:10.1002/pen.24982