Graph-based keyword spotting in historical manuscripts using Hausdorff edit distance

•Graph-based keyword spotting method using Hausdorff edit distance.•Flexible: matching arbitrary graphs with any label alphabets.•Efficient: quadratic time complexity with respect to graph size.•Effective: outperforms other template-based spotting methods.•Evaluation on four benchmark datasets inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pattern recognition letters 2019-04, Vol.121, p.61-67
Hauptverfasser: Ameri, Mohammad Reza, Stauffer, Michael, Riesen, Kaspar, Bui, Tien D., Fischer, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Graph-based keyword spotting method using Hausdorff edit distance.•Flexible: matching arbitrary graphs with any label alphabets.•Efficient: quadratic time complexity with respect to graph size.•Effective: outperforms other template-based spotting methods.•Evaluation on four benchmark datasets including recent competition. Keyword spotting enables content-based retrieval of scanned historical manuscripts using search terms, which, in turn, facilitates the indexation in digital libraries. Recent approaches include graph-based representations that capture the complex structure of handwriting. However, the high representational power of graphs comes at the cost of high computational complexity for graph matching. In this article, we investigate the potential of Hausdorff edit distance (HED) for keyword spotting. It is an efficient quadratic-time approximation of the graph edit distance. In a comprehensive experimental evaluation with four types of handwriting graphs and four benchmark datasets (George Washington, Parzival, Botany, and Alvermann Konzilsprotokolle), we demonstrate a strong performance of the proposed HED-based method when compared with the state of the art, both, in terms of precision and speed.
ISSN:0167-8655
1872-7344
DOI:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.05.003