Can citizen science data guide the surveillance of invasive plants? A model-based test with Acacia trees in Portugal

With the rapid expansion of invasive alien plants (IAPs), accurate and timely distribution data is increasingly critical to successful management. However, it is not easy for researchers/technicians to obtain data for all IAPs and territories. In this context, data collected by Citizen Science Platf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2019-06, Vol.21 (6), p.2127-2141
Hauptverfasser: César de Sá, Nuno, Marchante, Hélia, Marchante, Elizabete, Cabral, João Alexandre, Honrado, João Pradinho, Vicente, Joana Raquel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With the rapid expansion of invasive alien plants (IAPs), accurate and timely distribution data is increasingly critical to successful management. However, it is not easy for researchers/technicians to obtain data for all IAPs and territories. In this context, data collected by Citizen Science Platforms can be a useful tool, complementing professional data. We hypothesize that combining IAP data collected by citizens and data collected by researchers can improve the accuracy of species distribution models (SDMs) and optimize surveillance efforts. To test this, we gathered data from a Citizen Science Platform (Invasoras.pt) and from researchers on three invasive Acacia species widespread in Portugal and generated three different datasets: researchers, citizens, and researchers plus citizens. We modelled the potential distribution of the species using an ensemble approach (biomod2 R package) to test the effect of the different datasets on the resulting model accuracy, the selected environmental drivers of species distribution and the predicted spatial distribution. All SDMs obtained very high accuracy, with the highest values being obtained in the models trained with researchers’ data. Nevertheless, models trained with citizen data vastly increased the predicted spatial distribution in all cases. The spatial projections of the three models were further compared and ranked to identify the areas of highest surveillance priority for each species, i.e., areas with high agreement between the models but where occurrence data is lacking. These results can be used to guide future surveillance efforts both for citizens and researchers.
ISSN:1387-3547
1573-1464
DOI:10.1007/s10530-019-01962-6