Anesthesia for restrictive bariatric surgery (gastric bypass not included): laparoscopic vs open procedures
Publications regarding anesthetic management for weight reduction surgery are scarce. We reviewed the records of 234 patients who underwent bariatric restrictive procedures (gastric bypass not included) from May 1999 to September 2000. Variables analyzed included demographics, anesthetic data and pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Obesity 2004-09, Vol.28 (9), p.1157-1162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Publications regarding anesthetic management for weight reduction surgery are scarce. We reviewed the records of 234 patients who underwent bariatric restrictive procedures (gastric bypass not included) from May 1999 to September 2000. Variables analyzed included demographics, anesthetic data and perioperative course. Patients were allocated into two groups: laparoscopic (LPG) and open procedures (OPG), comprising 167 and 67 patients respectively. Obstructive sleep apnea was present in 4.8% in LPG
vs
6.1% in OPG. Awake fiberoptic intubation was performed in 3.6% in LPG and 1.5% in OPG. The other patients were anesthetized with rapid sequence induction (classic or modified). Grade III laryngoscopy was present in 6% in LPG and 7.1% in OPG. No intraoperative complications were encountered. Postoperative PACU follow-up time was similar. In both groups, i.v. meperidine was most frequently used for postoperative analgesia (in the PACU), as compared to the other analgesics employed (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0307-0565 1476-5497 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802709 |