"Special Needs" and the Fourth Amendment: An Exception Poised to Swallow the Warrant Preference Rule
Buffaloe believes that the consequences of loosely defining a special need are intolerable and that the balancing test offends Fourth Amendment principles by containing within it no consideration of the requirement of individualized suspicion.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard civil rights-civil liberties law review 1997-07, Vol.32 (2), p.529 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Buffaloe believes that the consequences of loosely defining a special need are intolerable and that the balancing test offends Fourth Amendment principles by containing within it no consideration of the requirement of individualized suspicion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-8039 1943-5061 |