Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean
It is well established that dicamba can cause severe injury to soybean that is not resistant to dicamba. Dicamba-resistant (DR) cotton became available in 2015, followed by DR soybean in 2016; in late 2016 came the release of new dicamba formulations approved for topical use in cotton and soybeans....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.51-65 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 65 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Jones, Gordon T Norsworthy, Jason K Barber, Tom Gbur, Edward Kruger, Greg R |
| description | It is well established that dicamba can cause severe injury to soybean that is not resistant to dicamba. Dicamba-resistant (DR) cotton became available in 2015, followed by DR soybean in 2016; in late 2016 came the release of new dicamba formulations approved for topical use in cotton and soybeans. Until this approval, use of dicamba was limited to primarily corn, small grains, range and pasture, and eco-fallow acres. Hence, studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to examine off-target movement of two dicamba formulations using non-DR soybean as a bio-indicator. Diglycolamine (DGA) and N,N-Bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine (BAPMA) dicamba were applied simultaneously at 560 g ae ha–1 in the center of two side-byside 8-ha fields to vegetative glufosinate-resistant soybean. On the same day, a rate response experiment was established encompassing nine different dicamba rates of each formulation. Results from the rate response experiment indicate that soybean is equally sensitive to DGA and BAPMA dicamba. In 2015, a rain event occurring 6 to 8 h after application of the large drift trial probably limited off-target movement by incorporating some of the herbicide into the soil. As a result, secondary drift was less in 2015 than in 2016. However, minimal secondary injury ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2018.121 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2191064157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26714967</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26714967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-b63c50b7b464565b776ff1f3ba4cd265eb49af894a782b473a7bb299a69164dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4MoOKc3r0LAm9iZpPlojnXTKWxMmIK3kLSJdLhmJtlk_70dFY-e3sP78PzgAeASoxFGWNx92zQiCBcjTPARGGDGUEYERcdggAqJMpSL91NwFuMKIcwJQQNQLpzLkg4fNsG539m1bRP0Dk6mJdRtDe_Ll3kJJ02l10bD5OHStrFJzc7Cpd8bq9tzcOL0Z7QXv3cI3h4fXsdP2WwxfR6Xs8zkrEiZ4XnFkBGGcso4M0Jw57DLjaZVTTizhkrtCkm1KIihItfCGCKl5hJzWtf5EFz33k3wX1sbk1r5bWi7SUWwxIhTzERH3fZUFXyMwTq1Cc1ah73CSB0iqS6SOkRSXaQOv-rxVUw-_LGEC0wlP-hu-r9pvG_t_7Ife59vCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2191064157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Jones, Gordon T ; Norsworthy, Jason K ; Barber, Tom ; Gbur, Edward ; Kruger, Greg R</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Gordon T ; Norsworthy, Jason K ; Barber, Tom ; Gbur, Edward ; Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><description>It is well established that dicamba can cause severe injury to soybean that is not resistant to dicamba. Dicamba-resistant (DR) cotton became available in 2015, followed by DR soybean in 2016; in late 2016 came the release of new dicamba formulations approved for topical use in cotton and soybeans. Until this approval, use of dicamba was limited to primarily corn, small grains, range and pasture, and eco-fallow acres. Hence, studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to examine off-target movement of two dicamba formulations using non-DR soybean as a bio-indicator. Diglycolamine (DGA) and N,N-Bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine (BAPMA) dicamba were applied simultaneously at 560 g ae ha–1 in the center of two side-byside 8-ha fields to vegetative glufosinate-resistant soybean. On the same day, a rate response experiment was established encompassing nine different dicamba rates of each formulation. Results from the rate response experiment indicate that soybean is equally sensitive to DGA and BAPMA dicamba. In 2015, a rain event occurring 6 to 8 h after application of the large drift trial probably limited off-target movement by incorporating some of the herbicide into the soil. As a result, secondary drift was less in 2015 than in 2016. However, minimal secondary injury (<5%) occurred 12m farther into DGA dicamba plots in 2015. In 2016, secondary movement was decreased by 72m when BAPMA dicamba was used compared to DGA dicamba. Appreciable secondary movement of both DGA and BAPMA dicamba is possible following in-crop applications of either formulated product to soybean in early to mid-summer. Additionally, the risk for secondary movement of BAPMA dicamba is slightly less than for DGA dicamba. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glufosinate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2018.121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acids ; Bioassays ; Bioindicators ; Corn ; Cotton ; Crops ; dicamba symptomology ; dicamba-resistant soybean ; dicambaresistant cotton ; Drift ; Formulations ; Glufosinate ; Herbicides ; Indicator species ; leaf malformation ; Leaves ; Loam soils ; Methylamine ; Off-target movement ; Pasture ; Soybeans ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.51-65</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (the “License”) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-b63c50b7b464565b776ff1f3ba4cd265eb49af894a782b473a7bb299a69164dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-b63c50b7b464565b776ff1f3ba4cd265eb49af894a782b473a7bb299a69164dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1353-2308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26714967$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26714967$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norsworthy, Jason K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gbur, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><title>Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>It is well established that dicamba can cause severe injury to soybean that is not resistant to dicamba. Dicamba-resistant (DR) cotton became available in 2015, followed by DR soybean in 2016; in late 2016 came the release of new dicamba formulations approved for topical use in cotton and soybeans. Until this approval, use of dicamba was limited to primarily corn, small grains, range and pasture, and eco-fallow acres. Hence, studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to examine off-target movement of two dicamba formulations using non-DR soybean as a bio-indicator. Diglycolamine (DGA) and N,N-Bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine (BAPMA) dicamba were applied simultaneously at 560 g ae ha–1 in the center of two side-byside 8-ha fields to vegetative glufosinate-resistant soybean. On the same day, a rate response experiment was established encompassing nine different dicamba rates of each formulation. Results from the rate response experiment indicate that soybean is equally sensitive to DGA and BAPMA dicamba. In 2015, a rain event occurring 6 to 8 h after application of the large drift trial probably limited off-target movement by incorporating some of the herbicide into the soil. As a result, secondary drift was less in 2015 than in 2016. However, minimal secondary injury (<5%) occurred 12m farther into DGA dicamba plots in 2015. In 2016, secondary movement was decreased by 72m when BAPMA dicamba was used compared to DGA dicamba. Appreciable secondary movement of both DGA and BAPMA dicamba is possible following in-crop applications of either formulated product to soybean in early to mid-summer. Additionally, the risk for secondary movement of BAPMA dicamba is slightly less than for DGA dicamba. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glufosinate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Bioindicators</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>dicamba symptomology</subject><subject>dicamba-resistant soybean</subject><subject>dicambaresistant cotton</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Glufosinate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>leaf malformation</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Methylamine</subject><subject>Off-target movement</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4MoOKc3r0LAm9iZpPlojnXTKWxMmIK3kLSJdLhmJtlk_70dFY-e3sP78PzgAeASoxFGWNx92zQiCBcjTPARGGDGUEYERcdggAqJMpSL91NwFuMKIcwJQQNQLpzLkg4fNsG539m1bRP0Dk6mJdRtDe_Ll3kJJ02l10bD5OHStrFJzc7Cpd8bq9tzcOL0Z7QXv3cI3h4fXsdP2WwxfR6Xs8zkrEiZ4XnFkBGGcso4M0Jw57DLjaZVTTizhkrtCkm1KIihItfCGCKl5hJzWtf5EFz33k3wX1sbk1r5bWi7SUWwxIhTzERH3fZUFXyMwTq1Cc1ah73CSB0iqS6SOkRSXaQOv-rxVUw-_LGEC0wlP-hu-r9pvG_t_7Ife59vCw</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Jones, Gordon T</creator><creator>Norsworthy, Jason K</creator><creator>Barber, Tom</creator><creator>Gbur, Edward</creator><creator>Kruger, Greg R</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-2308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean</title><author>Jones, Gordon T ; Norsworthy, Jason K ; Barber, Tom ; Gbur, Edward ; Kruger, Greg R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-b63c50b7b464565b776ff1f3ba4cd265eb49af894a782b473a7bb299a69164dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Bioindicators</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>dicamba symptomology</topic><topic>dicamba-resistant soybean</topic><topic>dicambaresistant cotton</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Glufosinate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>leaf malformation</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Methylamine</topic><topic>Off-target movement</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norsworthy, Jason K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gbur, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Gordon T</au><au>Norsworthy, Jason K</au><au>Barber, Tom</au><au>Gbur, Edward</au><au>Kruger, Greg R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>51-65</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>It is well established that dicamba can cause severe injury to soybean that is not resistant to dicamba. Dicamba-resistant (DR) cotton became available in 2015, followed by DR soybean in 2016; in late 2016 came the release of new dicamba formulations approved for topical use in cotton and soybeans. Until this approval, use of dicamba was limited to primarily corn, small grains, range and pasture, and eco-fallow acres. Hence, studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to examine off-target movement of two dicamba formulations using non-DR soybean as a bio-indicator. Diglycolamine (DGA) and N,N-Bis(3-aminopropyl)methylamine (BAPMA) dicamba were applied simultaneously at 560 g ae ha–1 in the center of two side-byside 8-ha fields to vegetative glufosinate-resistant soybean. On the same day, a rate response experiment was established encompassing nine different dicamba rates of each formulation. Results from the rate response experiment indicate that soybean is equally sensitive to DGA and BAPMA dicamba. In 2015, a rain event occurring 6 to 8 h after application of the large drift trial probably limited off-target movement by incorporating some of the herbicide into the soil. As a result, secondary drift was less in 2015 than in 2016. However, minimal secondary injury (<5%) occurred 12m farther into DGA dicamba plots in 2015. In 2016, secondary movement was decreased by 72m when BAPMA dicamba was used compared to DGA dicamba. Appreciable secondary movement of both DGA and BAPMA dicamba is possible following in-crop applications of either formulated product to soybean in early to mid-summer. Additionally, the risk for secondary movement of BAPMA dicamba is slightly less than for DGA dicamba. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glufosinate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2018.121</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-2308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 2019-02, Vol.33 (1), p.51-65 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2191064157 |
| source | Cambridge Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Acids Bioassays Bioindicators Corn Cotton Crops dicamba symptomology dicamba-resistant soybean dicambaresistant cotton Drift Formulations Glufosinate Herbicides Indicator species leaf malformation Leaves Loam soils Methylamine Off-target movement Pasture Soybeans Volatility |
| title | Off-target Movement of DGA and BAPMA Dicamba to Sensitive Soybean |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A31%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Off-target%20Movement%20of%20DGA%20and%20BAPMA%20Dicamba%20to%20Sensitive%20Soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Jones,%20Gordon%20T&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=51-65&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2018.121&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26714967%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2191064157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26714967&rfr_iscdi=true |