Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests
•I found evidence of adaptation to climate change among individual forest owners.•Forest owners exhibited autonomous, reactive, and incremental responses.•Forest owners also exhibited planned and proactive responses.•Forest owners sought to transition to new conditions and be resilient to change.•Ad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global environmental change 2019-01, Vol.54, p.160-171 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •I found evidence of adaptation to climate change among individual forest owners.•Forest owners exhibited autonomous, reactive, and incremental responses.•Forest owners also exhibited planned and proactive responses.•Forest owners sought to transition to new conditions and be resilient to change.•Adaptation research and policy should account for scales of stressors and responses.
A growing body of research documents how individuals respond to local impacts of global climate change and a range of policy efforts aim to help individuals reduce their exposure and improve their livelihoods despite these stressors. Yet there is still limited understanding of how to determine whether and how adaptation is occurring. Through qualitative analysis of focus group interviews, I evaluated individual behavioral responses to local forest stressors that can arguably be linked to global climate change among landowners in the Upper Midwest, USA. I found that landowner responses were planned as well as autonomous, more proactive than reactive, incremental rather than transformational, and aimed at being resilient to change and transitioning to new conditions, rather than resisting change alone. Many of the landowners’ responses can be considered forms of adaptation, rather than coping, because they were aimed at moderating and avoiding harm on long time horizons in anticipation of change. These findings stand in contrast to the short-term, reactive, and incremental responses that current socio-psychological theories of adaptation suggest are more typical at the individual level. This study contributes to scientific understanding of how to evaluate behavioral adaptation to climate change and differentiate it from coping, which is necessary for developing conceptually rigorous analytical frameworks to guide research and policy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-3780 1872-9495 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.011 |