Characterising climate change discourse on social media during extreme weather events

•The principal frames employed to discuss climate change differed between the events.•Event characteristics and socio-political context markedly influenced the discourse.•Non-hoax frames dominated during Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy.•Discourse was spilt between non-hoax and hoax frames during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global environmental change 2019-01, Vol.54, p.50-60
Hauptverfasser: Roxburgh, Nicholas, Guan, Dabo, Shin, Kong Joo, Rand, William, Managi, Shunsuke, Lovelace, Robin, Meng, Jing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The principal frames employed to discuss climate change differed between the events.•Event characteristics and socio-political context markedly influenced the discourse.•Non-hoax frames dominated during Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy.•Discourse was spilt between non-hoax and hoax frames during Snowstorm Jonas. When extreme weather events occur, people often turn to social media platforms to share information, opinions and experiences. One of the topics commonly discussed is the role climate change may or may not have played in influencing an event. Here, we examine Twitter posts that mentioned climate change in the context of three high-magnitude extreme weather events – Hurricane Irene, Hurricane Sandy and Snowstorm Jonas – in order to assess how the framing of the topic and the attention paid to it can vary between events. We also examine the role that contextual factors can play in shaping climate change coverage on the platform. We find that criticism of climate change denial dominated during Irene, while political and ideological struggle frames dominated during Sandy. Discourse during Jonas was, in contrast, more divided between posts about the scientific links between climate change and the events, and posts contesting climate science in general. The focus on political and ideological struggle frames during Sandy reflects the event’s occurrence at a time when the Occupy movement was active and the 2012 US Presidential Election was nearing. These factors, we suggest, could also contribute to climate change being a more prominent discussion point during Sandy than during Irene or Jonas. The Jonas frames, meanwhile, hint at lesser public understanding of how climate change may influence cold weather events when compared with tropical storms. Overall, our findings demonstrate how event characteristics and short-term socio-political context can play a critical role in determining the lenses through which climate change is viewed.
ISSN:0959-3780
1872-9495
DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004