How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen
Meier and Krashen, both employed in California's education system, do an injustice to students in rehashing an already settled battle. Fed up with two decades of failure, California voters replaced bilingual education with structured English immersion. Meier and Krashen offer no suggestions for...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Phi Delta Kappan 1999-05, Vol.80 (9), p.707-710 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 710 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 707 |
| container_title | Phi Delta Kappan |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Baker, Keith |
| description | Meier and Krashen, both employed in California's education system, do an injustice to students in rehashing an already settled battle. Fed up with two decades of failure, California voters replaced bilingual education with structured English immersion. Meier and Krashen offer no suggestions for coping with Proposition 227. (27 references) (MLH) |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218468034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ585686</ericid><jstor_id>20439542</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20439542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e251t-78f2bb92b590a16df08e30d1ebd217cfea9bb5ce7caae6decfee72a37852a0773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1jktLw0AUhQdRsFb_gcKg68CdV2ayklpaq9ZnFZdhktzQlJrEmUTpv3cg4s7Vgft9nHv2yIglEqJYGr1PRgCCRZozfUiOvN8AAGMgR-R50XzTqa3pO9Ir9B1doftCupw90VXXF1h3_pJO6Au22x3tGvpQ5etmaz29xwodtXURPGzXWNM7Z33IY3JQ2q3Hk98ck7f57HW6iJaP1zfTyTJCrlgXaVPyLEt4phKwLC5KMCigYJgVYWVeok2yTOWoc2sxLjBcUHMrtFHcgtZiTM6H3tY1n32Ynm6a3tXhZcqZkbEBIYN08Z_EtIKEARgTrNPBQlflaeuqD-t26exWGRWbOOCzAW9817g_zkGKREkufgC44mmy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218468034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Baker, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Meier and Krashen, both employed in California's education system, do an injustice to students in rehashing an already settled battle. Fed up with two decades of failure, California voters replaced bilingual education with structured English immersion. Meier and Krashen offer no suggestions for coping with Proposition 227. (27 references) (MLH)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington, Ind., etc: Phi Delta Kappa Inc</publisher><subject>At Odds: Education and the Economy ; Bile pigments ; Bilingual Education ; Bilingual Education Programs ; Bilingual schools ; Bilingual students ; Bilingualism ; Children ; Curricula ; Education policy ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English ; English as a second language ; English Instruction ; Evaluation Research ; Grade 4 ; Graphs ; Immersion Programs ; Intermediate Grades ; Language immersion programs ; Language Proficiency ; Learning ; Limited English proficiency ; Limited English Speaking ; Longitudinal Studies ; Meta Analysis ; Misconceptions ; Native Speakers ; Politics of Education ; Program Evaluation ; Proposition 227 (California 1998) ; Research Problems ; Romance Languages ; School Districts ; Second Language Instruction ; State Legislation ; Time on Task</subject><ispartof>Phi Delta Kappan, 1999-05, Vol.80 (9), p.707-710</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Phi Delta Kappa International, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Phi Delta Kappa May 1999</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20439542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20439542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ585686$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen</title><title>Phi Delta Kappan</title><description>Meier and Krashen, both employed in California's education system, do an injustice to students in rehashing an already settled battle. Fed up with two decades of failure, California voters replaced bilingual education with structured English immersion. Meier and Krashen offer no suggestions for coping with Proposition 227. (27 references) (MLH)</description><subject>At Odds: Education and the Economy</subject><subject>Bile pigments</subject><subject>Bilingual Education</subject><subject>Bilingual Education Programs</subject><subject>Bilingual schools</subject><subject>Bilingual students</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Immersion Programs</subject><subject>Intermediate Grades</subject><subject>Language immersion programs</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Limited English proficiency</subject><subject>Limited English Speaking</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Native Speakers</subject><subject>Politics of Education</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Proposition 227 (California 1998)</subject><subject>Research Problems</subject><subject>Romance Languages</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>State Legislation</subject><subject>Time on Task</subject><issn>0031-7217</issn><issn>1940-6487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1jktLw0AUhQdRsFb_gcKg68CdV2ayklpaq9ZnFZdhktzQlJrEmUTpv3cg4s7Vgft9nHv2yIglEqJYGr1PRgCCRZozfUiOvN8AAGMgR-R50XzTqa3pO9Ir9B1doftCupw90VXXF1h3_pJO6Au22x3tGvpQ5etmaz29xwodtXURPGzXWNM7Z33IY3JQ2q3Hk98ck7f57HW6iJaP1zfTyTJCrlgXaVPyLEt4phKwLC5KMCigYJgVYWVeok2yTOWoc2sxLjBcUHMrtFHcgtZiTM6H3tY1n32Ynm6a3tXhZcqZkbEBIYN08Z_EtIKEARgTrNPBQlflaeuqD-t26exWGRWbOOCzAW9817g_zkGKREkufgC44mmy</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Baker, Keith</creator><general>Phi Delta Kappa Inc</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa, inc</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>JQTRK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>7XI</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen</title><author>Baker, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e251t-78f2bb92b590a16df08e30d1ebd217cfea9bb5ce7caae6decfee72a37852a0773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>At Odds: Education and the Economy</topic><topic>Bile pigments</topic><topic>Bilingual Education</topic><topic>Bilingual Education Programs</topic><topic>Bilingual schools</topic><topic>Bilingual students</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Immersion Programs</topic><topic>Intermediate Grades</topic><topic>Language immersion programs</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Limited English proficiency</topic><topic>Limited English Speaking</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Native Speakers</topic><topic>Politics of Education</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Proposition 227 (California 1998)</topic><topic>Research Problems</topic><topic>Romance Languages</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>State Legislation</topic><topic>Time on Task</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 34</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Teacher Journals</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ585686</ericid><atitle>How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen</atitle><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>707-710</pages><issn>0031-7217</issn><eissn>1940-6487</eissn><abstract>Meier and Krashen, both employed in California's education system, do an injustice to students in rehashing an already settled battle. Fed up with two decades of failure, California voters replaced bilingual education with structured English immersion. Meier and Krashen offer no suggestions for coping with Proposition 227. (27 references) (MLH)</abstract><cop>Bloomington, Ind., etc</cop><pub>Phi Delta Kappa Inc</pub><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-7217 |
| ispartof | Phi Delta Kappan, 1999-05, Vol.80 (9), p.707-710 |
| issn | 0031-7217 1940-6487 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218468034 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | At Odds: Education and the Economy Bile pigments Bilingual Education Bilingual Education Programs Bilingual schools Bilingual students Bilingualism Children Curricula Education policy Elementary Secondary Education English English as a second language English Instruction Evaluation Research Grade 4 Graphs Immersion Programs Intermediate Grades Language immersion programs Language Proficiency Learning Limited English proficiency Limited English Speaking Longitudinal Studies Meta Analysis Misconceptions Native Speakers Politics of Education Program Evaluation Proposition 227 (California 1998) Research Problems Romance Languages School Districts Second Language Instruction State Legislation Time on Task |
| title | How Can We Best Serve LEP Students? A Reply to Nicholas Meier and Stephen Krashen |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Can%20We%20Best%20Serve%20LEP%20Students?%20A%20Reply%20to%20Nicholas%20Meier%20and%20Stephen%20Krashen&rft.jtitle=Phi%20Delta%20Kappan&rft.au=Baker,%20Keith&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=707-710&rft.issn=0031-7217&rft.eissn=1940-6487&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20439542%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218468034&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ585686&rft_jstor_id=20439542&rfr_iscdi=true |