Stopping to Reflect

Stopping to Reflect

Through a sequence of examples, a recent article by Frank Arntzenius, "Some Problems for Conditionalization and Reflection," purports to show limitations for a combination of two inductive principles that relate current and future rational degrees of belief. Schervish et al. contend that n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of philosophy 2004-06, Vol.101 (6), p.315-322
Hauptverfasser: Schervish, M. J., Seidenfeld, T., Kadane, J. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Belief
Comments and Criticism
Conditional probabilities
Knowledge
Philosophy
Prisons
Random variables
Scientific belief
Stopping distances
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Through a sequence of examples, a recent article by Frank Arntzenius, "Some Problems for Conditionalization and Reflection," purports to show limitations for a combination of two inductive principles that relate current and future rational degrees of belief. Schervish et al. contend that neither of these principles is mandatory for a rational agent.
ISSN:0022-362X
1939-8549
DOI:10.5840/jphil2004101614