Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning

As ABET and regional accreditation agencies focus their attention on student learning, effective planning processes and practices become critical to the departments and colleges that must initiate them. The lessons learned from the Synthesis Coalition's experience can be applied at the departme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 1998-04, Vol.87 (2), p.157-165
Hauptverfasser: McMartin, Flora, Duzer, Eric Van, Agogino, Alice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 87
creator McMartin, Flora
Duzer, Eric Van
Agogino, Alice
description As ABET and regional accreditation agencies focus their attention on student learning, effective planning processes and practices become critical to the departments and colleges that must initiate them. The lessons learned from the Synthesis Coalition's experience can be applied at the departmental level to meet the requirements of these agencies. The planning strategy focused on a collaborative process that involved all stakeholders: faculty, administrators, students, and industry representatives. The stakeholders validated and prioritized the Coalition's original goals and identified a specific set of abilities, criteria, and activities associated with them. (The goals included, to facilitate: communication, teamwork, hands‐on facility with hardware, awareness of the social implications of engineering, modern industry practices, multi‐disciplinary design, and open‐ended problem solving.) The Coalition's industrial board provided written scenarios of “day in the life” challenges engineers face to help ensure that the values and goals the Coalition planned to assess matched those that industry felt were important. Next, course documents were analyzed to identify a set of assignments to use for developing authentic, performance‐based assessment tools. This approach assured that by participating in the Synthesis Coalition assessment project, each campus prepared a core group of faculty to assess (and train other faculty to assess) student learning and ultimately document evidence of student learning for ABET accreditation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217938197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29330688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2966-b4804f94f82d7bd54bd78a0cf68834a8475e1d5432a1594a57ed0d9797030923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1uGjEUha2qlUqTvoPFukOvxzP-yaISoeQHQVslkbq0DPYg08EQ25PA28cTouy7ulfX3zmWPoSGBEYEoPy-GZWEiUIKmg9SilFaAlDKRocPaPD-9BENCDBZVJzCZ_Qlxg0ASGB8gMJlcGbt_Br_dE82RItvfUwudcntfPyGF12b3L61eOozZW14Re1eh7S1PmVCe5MzpospHC_wGE90LrlPnTli5_E4Rhtjj-I_rfY-x8_Rp0a30X59m2fo4Wr6MLkp5r-vbyfjebEqJWPFshJQNbJqRGn40tTV0nChYdUwIWilRcVrS_KZlprUstI1twaM5JIDBVnSMzQ81e7D7rGzManNrgs-_6hKwiUVRPIMXZygVdjFGGyj9sFtdTgqAqo3rDaq16h6jao3rN4Mq0MO_ziFn11rj_-RVLPpNC-5oDgVuJjs4b1Ah3-Kccpr9ffXtbqCSybrxUzd0RebgJKX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217938197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McMartin, Flora ; Duzer, Eric Van ; Agogino, Alice</creator><creatorcontrib>McMartin, Flora ; Duzer, Eric Van ; Agogino, Alice</creatorcontrib><description>As ABET and regional accreditation agencies focus their attention on student learning, effective planning processes and practices become critical to the departments and colleges that must initiate them. The lessons learned from the Synthesis Coalition's experience can be applied at the departmental level to meet the requirements of these agencies. The planning strategy focused on a collaborative process that involved all stakeholders: faculty, administrators, students, and industry representatives. The stakeholders validated and prioritized the Coalition's original goals and identified a specific set of abilities, criteria, and activities associated with them. (The goals included, to facilitate: communication, teamwork, hands‐on facility with hardware, awareness of the social implications of engineering, modern industry practices, multi‐disciplinary design, and open‐ended problem solving.) The Coalition's industrial board provided written scenarios of “day in the life” challenges engineers face to help ensure that the values and goals the Coalition planned to assess matched those that industry felt were important. Next, course documents were analyzed to identify a set of assignments to use for developing authentic, performance‐based assessment tools. This approach assured that by participating in the Synthesis Coalition assessment project, each campus prepared a core group of faculty to assess (and train other faculty to assess) student learning and ultimately document evidence of student learning for ABET accreditation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-9830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEDEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Classroom Research ; Departments ; Engineering Education ; Leaders ; Performance Based Assessment ; Program Evaluation ; Stakeholders ; Thinking Skills ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 1998-04, Vol.87 (2), p.157-165</ispartof><rights>1998 American Society for Engineering Education</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Engineering Education Apr 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2966-b4804f94f82d7bd54bd78a0cf68834a8475e1d5432a1594a57ed0d9797030923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2966-b4804f94f82d7bd54bd78a0cf68834a8475e1d5432a1594a57ed0d9797030923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMartin, Flora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duzer, Eric Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agogino, Alice</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning</title><title>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>As ABET and regional accreditation agencies focus their attention on student learning, effective planning processes and practices become critical to the departments and colleges that must initiate them. The lessons learned from the Synthesis Coalition's experience can be applied at the departmental level to meet the requirements of these agencies. The planning strategy focused on a collaborative process that involved all stakeholders: faculty, administrators, students, and industry representatives. The stakeholders validated and prioritized the Coalition's original goals and identified a specific set of abilities, criteria, and activities associated with them. (The goals included, to facilitate: communication, teamwork, hands‐on facility with hardware, awareness of the social implications of engineering, modern industry practices, multi‐disciplinary design, and open‐ended problem solving.) The Coalition's industrial board provided written scenarios of “day in the life” challenges engineers face to help ensure that the values and goals the Coalition planned to assess matched those that industry felt were important. Next, course documents were analyzed to identify a set of assignments to use for developing authentic, performance‐based assessment tools. This approach assured that by participating in the Synthesis Coalition assessment project, each campus prepared a core group of faculty to assess (and train other faculty to assess) student learning and ultimately document evidence of student learning for ABET accreditation.</description><subject>Classroom Research</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Engineering Education</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>Performance Based Assessment</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1069-4730</issn><issn>2168-9830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM1uGjEUha2qlUqTvoPFukOvxzP-yaISoeQHQVslkbq0DPYg08EQ25PA28cTouy7ulfX3zmWPoSGBEYEoPy-GZWEiUIKmg9SilFaAlDKRocPaPD-9BENCDBZVJzCZ_Qlxg0ASGB8gMJlcGbt_Br_dE82RItvfUwudcntfPyGF12b3L61eOozZW14Re1eh7S1PmVCe5MzpospHC_wGE90LrlPnTli5_E4Rhtjj-I_rfY-x8_Rp0a30X59m2fo4Wr6MLkp5r-vbyfjebEqJWPFshJQNbJqRGn40tTV0nChYdUwIWilRcVrS_KZlprUstI1twaM5JIDBVnSMzQ81e7D7rGzManNrgs-_6hKwiUVRPIMXZygVdjFGGyj9sFtdTgqAqo3rDaq16h6jao3rN4Mq0MO_ziFn11rj_-RVLPpNC-5oDgVuJjs4b1Ah3-Kccpr9ffXtbqCSybrxUzd0RebgJKX</recordid><startdate>199804</startdate><enddate>199804</enddate><creator>McMartin, Flora</creator><creator>Duzer, Eric Van</creator><creator>Agogino, Alice</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199804</creationdate><title>Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning</title><author>McMartin, Flora ; Duzer, Eric Van ; Agogino, Alice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2966-b4804f94f82d7bd54bd78a0cf68834a8475e1d5432a1594a57ed0d9797030923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Classroom Research</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Engineering Education</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>Performance Based Assessment</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMartin, Flora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duzer, Eric Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agogino, Alice</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMartin, Flora</au><au>Duzer, Eric Van</au><au>Agogino, Alice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>1998-04</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>157-165</pages><issn>1069-4730</issn><eissn>2168-9830</eissn><coden>JEEDEQ</coden><abstract>As ABET and regional accreditation agencies focus their attention on student learning, effective planning processes and practices become critical to the departments and colleges that must initiate them. The lessons learned from the Synthesis Coalition's experience can be applied at the departmental level to meet the requirements of these agencies. The planning strategy focused on a collaborative process that involved all stakeholders: faculty, administrators, students, and industry representatives. The stakeholders validated and prioritized the Coalition's original goals and identified a specific set of abilities, criteria, and activities associated with them. (The goals included, to facilitate: communication, teamwork, hands‐on facility with hardware, awareness of the social implications of engineering, modern industry practices, multi‐disciplinary design, and open‐ended problem solving.) The Coalition's industrial board provided written scenarios of “day in the life” challenges engineers face to help ensure that the values and goals the Coalition planned to assess matched those that industry felt were important. Next, course documents were analyzed to identify a set of assignments to use for developing authentic, performance‐based assessment tools. This approach assured that by participating in the Synthesis Coalition assessment project, each campus prepared a core group of faculty to assess (and train other faculty to assess) student learning and ultimately document evidence of student learning for ABET accreditation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-4730
ispartof Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 1998-04, Vol.87 (2), p.157-165
issn 1069-4730
2168-9830
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_217938197
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Classroom Research
Departments
Engineering Education
Leaders
Performance Based Assessment
Program Evaluation
Stakeholders
Thinking Skills
Undergraduate Students
title Bridging Diverse Institutions, Multiple Engineering Departments, and Industry: A Case Study in Assessment Planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20Diverse%20Institutions,%20Multiple%20Engineering%20Departments,%20and%20Industry:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Assessment%20Planning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20engineering%20education%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=McMartin,%20Flora&rft.date=1998-04&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=157-165&rft.issn=1069-4730&rft.eissn=2168-9830&rft.coden=JEEDEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00336.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29330688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217938197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true