Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections [Research summary]

In a retrospective study, 75 emergency cesarean section cases were compared to 2 control groups: intrapartum nonemergent cesarean sections and elective cesarean sections. The goals of the study were to compare outcomes (using the proxy measure of Apgar scores in the case of neonatal outcomes) and to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of rural medicine 1998-10, Vol.3 (4), p.261
Hauptverfasser: Schauberger, C W, Rooney, B L, Beguin, E A, Shaper, A M, Spindler, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a retrospective study, 75 emergency cesarean section cases were compared to 2 control groups: intrapartum nonemergent cesarean sections and elective cesarean sections. The goals of the study were to compare outcomes (using the proxy measure of Apgar scores in the case of neonatal outcomes) and to determine the attainability of the standard.
ISSN:1203-7796
1488-237X