The Cambridge History of Christianity: Origins to Constantine
The decision to couple Marcion with the formation of the New Testament canon is anomalous; Harry Gamble's chapter succinctly summarizes what we know about Marcion and argues cogently that, while studying his work provides insight into the process of canon formation, Marcion actually had little...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Church History 2007, Vol.76 (1), p.163-165 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The decision to couple Marcion with the formation of the New Testament canon is anomalous; Harry Gamble's chapter succinctly summarizes what we know about Marcion and argues cogently that, while studying his work provides insight into the process of canon formation, Marcion actually had little influence on that process. Margaret Mitchell's chapter on the emergence of written forms points out the sheer anomaly that "a movement whose founder's only recorded act of writing was a short-lived and unread finger etching on wind-swept soil" (178) developed a bibliocentric culture and helps us understand how that happened. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-6407 1755-2613 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0009640700101489 |