Neostigmine added to lidocaine axillary plexus block for postoperative analgesia

Background and objective We have assessed the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of neostigmine when added to lidocaine for axillary brachial plexus block, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods We studied 34 ASA I or II patients undergoing elective ambulatory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of anaesthesiology 2001-04, Vol.18 (4), p.257-260
Hauptverfasser: Van Elstraete, A. C., Pastureau, F., Lebrun, T., Mehdaoui, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and objective We have assessed the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of neostigmine when added to lidocaine for axillary brachial plexus block, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods We studied 34 ASA I or II patients undergoing elective ambulatory carpal tunnel release. Axillary brachial plexus block was performed using a peripheral nerve stimulator to locate the median nerve. All patients were administered 1.5% lidocaine 450 mg and epinephrine 5 μg mL−1. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups. Neostigmine 500|ig was added in group N, and saline 1 mL in group S. Results The duration of analgesia did not significantly differ between groups [mean (SD)]: 812.5 (456.9) for group S vs. 746.7 (474.1) min for group N (P >0.05). The need for supplementary analgesia did not significantly differ between groups: 4.4 (1.5) extra doses for group S vs. 3.8 (2.2) extra doses for group N (P>0.05). Visual analogue pain scores and occurrence of side-effects did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusion Neostigmine does not seem to be of clinical value for peripheral nerve blocks.
ISSN:0265-0215
1365-2346
DOI:10.1046/j.0265-0215.2000.00812.x