Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature

Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth's future 2018-12, Vol.6 (12), p.1660-1671
Hauptverfasser: Lo, Y. T. E., Charlton‐Perez, Andrew J., Highwood, Eleanor J., Lott, Fraser C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a way to geoengineer climate. While swift global mean surface cooling is generally expected from tropical SAI, the regional impacts of such perturbation on near‐surface air temperature (SAT) are projected to be spatially inhomogeneous. By using existing simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario, where 5 Tg/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) is injected into the tropical stratosphere to offset some of the warming in a midrange representative greenhouse gas concentration pathway (RCP4.5) between 2020 and 2070, we examine the regional detectability of the SAI surface cooling effect and attempt to find the best spatial scale for potential SAI monitoring. We use optimal fingerprint detection and attribution techniques to estimate the time horizon over which the SAI surface cooling effect would be detected after implementation in 2020 on subglobal scales, ranging from the near‐global in situ observational coverage down to subcontinental regions. We show that using the spatiotemporal SAT pattern across the Northern and Southern extratropics and the Tropics, and across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as averaging SATs over the whole globe robustly result in successful SAI detection within 10 years of geoengineering implementation in a majority of the included plausible geoengineering realizations. However, detecting the SAI effect on SAT within the first decade of implementation would be more challenging on subcontinental scales. Plain Language Summary It has been proposed that we could mimic explosive volcanic eruptions and inject sulfur dioxide gas into the upper atmosphere to cool Earth's surface. Climate models suggest that implementing this technology in the Tropics could lower global average temperature quickly, but it could cool some places more than the others. We use computer simulations of a midrange global warming scenario where this technology has been implemented, to estimate the time needed for its surface cooling effect to be detected over a range of regions of different sizes and locations. We find that we would have the highest chance to detect the cooling effect if we considered the space‐time cooling pattern across the extratropics and the Tropics, or across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, or if we averaged all surface temperature measurements over the globe. Smaller areas are less likely to show detectable surface cooling effec
ISSN:2328-4277
2328-4277
DOI:10.1029/2018EF000933