Relative Values: Qualification Programmes or Non-assessed Development?
Explores the differences between two categories of in-company management development programme: those that offer participants a nationally recognized qualification and those that are not assessed. The argument is made that certificating a programme will lead to different forms of experience and outc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of management development 1994, Vol.13 (5), p.14-24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Explores the differences between two categories of in-company management
development programme: those that offer participants a nationally
recognized qualification and those that are not assessed. The argument
is made that certificating a programme will lead to different forms of
experience and outcome for the participants and for the organization and
believes that it is important for clients and providers to be aware of
these differences when engaged in selecting, planning and running a
management development programme if maximum benefit from the investment
is to be gained. A tentative contingency theory is outlined. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0262-1711 1758-7492 |
DOI: | 10.1108/02621719410058347 |